Abstract:Cramér-Rao constitutes a crucial lower bound for the mean squared error of an estimator in frequentist parameter estimation, albeit paradoxically demanding highly accurate prior knowledge of the parameter to be estimated. Indeed, this information is needed to construct the optimal unbiased estimator, which is highly dependent on the parameter. Conversely, Bhattacharyya bounds result in a more resilient estimation about prior accuracy by imposing additional constraints on the estimator. Initially, we conduct a quantitative comparison of the performance between Cramér-Rao and Bhattacharyya bounds when faced with less-than-ideal prior knowledge of the parameter. Furthermore, we demonstrate that the $n^{th}$order classical and quantum Bhattacharyya bounds cannot be computed -- given the absence of estimators satisfying the constraints -- under specific conditions tied to the dimension $m$ of the discrete system. Intriguingly, for a system with the same dimension $m$, the maximum non-trivial order $n$ is $m-1$ in the classical case, while in the quantum realm, it extends to $m(m+1)/2-1$. Consequently, for a given system dimension, one can construct estimators in quantum systems that exhibit increased robustness to prior ignorance.

What problem does this paper attempt to address?

The problems that this paper attempts to solve mainly focus on the accuracy of parameter estimation in quantum metrology, especially how to evaluate and improve the performance of estimators when prior knowledge is inaccurate. Specifically, the paper explores the existence of unbiased resilient estimators in discrete quantum systems and compares the performance of different estimation methods in the face of non - ideal prior knowledge. ### Main problem decomposition: 1. **Limitations of the Cramér - Rao Bound (CRB)**: - The CRB is an important lower bound of the mean - squared error (MSE) in frequentist parameter estimation, but it requires very precise prior knowledge of the estimated parameter. - In practical applications, such high - precision prior knowledge is usually not feasible, so the CRB is often unattainable in the case of a finite sample. 2. **Application of the Bhattacharyya Bound (BhB)**: - The BhB makes the estimator more robust when prior knowledge is inaccurate by introducing additional constraints. - The paper studies the performance of the classical and quantum Bhattacharyya bounds in discrete systems of different dimensions and proves that these bounds cannot be calculated under certain conditions. 3. **Superiority of quantum systems**: - In discrete systems of the same dimension, the maximum non - trivial order of the quantum Bhattacharyya bound is $m(m + 1)/2-1$, while the maximum order in the classical case is $m - 1$. - This indicates that quantum systems can construct estimators that are more robust to prior ignorance. ### Specific content summary: - **Introduction section**: Introduces the research background of quantum metrology and its applications in physical parameter estimation, such as quantum phase estimation, position and speed estimation, etc. - **Theoretical framework**: Describes in detail the basic concepts and mathematical expressions of the Cramér - Rao bound and the Bhattacharyya bound. - **Comparative analysis**: Through the example of the Mach - Zehnder interferometer, it shows that when prior knowledge is inaccurate, the BhB provides a more reasonable lower bound of MSE than the CRB. - **Existence conditions**: Derives the necessary and sufficient conditions for the existence of the classical and quantum Bhattacharyya bounds and proves that these bounds cannot be calculated in some cases. - **Conclusion**: Emphasizes the advantages of quantum systems in constructing robust estimators and points out the directions for future research. Through these studies, the paper aims to provide a more practical and robust parameter estimation method, especially suitable for cases where prior information is incomplete or uncertain.

On the existence of unbiased resilient estimators in discrete quantum systems

Valid lower bound for all estimators in quantum parameter estimation

The gap persistence theorem for quantum multiparameter estimation

Evaluating the quantum optimal biased bound in a unitary evolution process

Hierarchies of Frequentist Bounds for Quantum Metrology: From Cramér-Rao to Barankin

Role of the extended Hilbert space in the attainability of the Quantum Cramér-Rao bound for multiparameter estimation

Unified Cramér-Rao bound for quantum multi-parameter estimation: Invertible and non-invertible Fisher information matrix

A geometric perspective: experimental evaluation of the quantum Cramer-Rao bound

Fundamental bounds for parameter estimation with few measurements

N ov 2 01 3 Optimal distinguishing observables for quantum parameter estimation

Comparison of estimation limits for quantum two-parameter estimation

Quantum metrology in the finite-sample regime

Optimal Condition for Measurement Observable Via Error-Propagation

Barycentric bounds on the error exponents of quantum hypothesis exclusion

Quantum-enhanced mean value estimation via adaptive measurement

Dimension matters: precision and incompatibility in multi-parameter quantum estimation models

Achieving the Multiparameter Quantum Cramér-Rao Bound with Antiunitary Symmetry

Advantages of quantum mechanics in the estimation theory

Holevo Cramér-Rao bound: How close can we get without entangling measurements?

Two-stage Quantum Estimation and the Asymptotics of Quantum-enhanced Transmittance Sensing