Abstract:Have Large Language Models (LLMs) developed a personality? The short answer is a resounding "We Don't Know!". In this paper, we show that we do not yet have the right tools to measure personality in language models. Personality is an important characteristic that influences behavior. As LLMs emulate human-like intelligence and performance in various tasks, a natural question to ask is whether these models have developed a personality. Previous works have evaluated machine personality through self-assessment personality tests, which are a set of multiple-choice questions created to evaluate personality in humans. A fundamental assumption here is that human personality tests can accurately measure personality in machines. In this paper, we investigate the emergence of personality in five LLMs of different sizes ranging from 1.5B to 30B. We propose the Option-Order Symmetry property as a necessary condition for the reliability of these self-assessment tests. Under this condition, the answer to self-assessment questions is invariant to the order in which the options are presented. We find that many LLMs personality test responses do not preserve option-order symmetry. We take a deeper look at LLMs test responses where option-order symmetry is preserved to find that in these cases, LLMs do not take into account the situational statement being tested and produce the exact same answer irrespective of the situation being tested. We also identify the existence of inherent biases in these LLMs which is the root cause of the aforementioned phenomenon and makes self-assessment tests unreliable. These observations indicate that self-assessment tests are not the correct tools to measure personality in LLMs. Through this paper, we hope to draw attention to the shortcomings of current literature in measuring personality in LLMs and call for developing tools for machine personality measurement.

Is Self-knowledge and Action Consistent or Not: Investigating Large Language Model's Personality

Is Cognition and Action Consistent or Not: Investigating Large Language Model's Personality

Have Large Language Models Developed a Personality?: Applicability of Self-Assessment Tests in Measuring Personality in LLMs

Humanity in AI: Detecting the Personality of Large Language Models

Self-assessment, Exhibition, and Recognition: a Review of Personality in Large Language Models

Identifying Multiple Personalities in Large Language Models with External Evaluation

Personality Traits in Large Language Models

Challenging the Validity of Personality Tests for Large Language Models

Illuminating the Black Box: A Psychometric Investigation into the Multifaceted Nature of Large Language Models

Personality testing of Large Language Models: Limited temporal stability, but highlighted prosociality

PersonaLLM: Investigating the Ability of Large Language Models to Express Personality Traits

LMLPA: Language Model Linguistic Personality Assessment

You don't need a personality test to know these models are unreliable: Assessing the Reliability of Large Language Models on Psychometric Instruments

Extroversion or Introversion? Controlling The Personality of Your Large Language Models

Assessing Social Alignment: Do Personality-Prompted Large Language Models Behave Like Humans?

What makes your model a low-empathy or warmth person: Exploring the Origins of Personality in LLMs

Eliciting Big Five Personality Traits in Large Language Models: A Textual Analysis with Classifier-Driven Approach

Eliciting Personality Traits in Large Language Models

Do LLMs Possess a Personality? Making the MBTI Test an Amazing Evaluation for Large Language Models

PersLLM: A Personified Training Approach for Large Language Models