Reduced-resolution beamforming: lowering the computational cost for pulsar and technosignature surveys

Danny C. Price
2024-04-10
Abstract:In radio astronomy, the science output of a telescope is often limited by computational resources. This is especially true for transient and technosignature surveys that need to search high-resolution data across a large parameter space. The tremendous data volumes produced by modern radio array telescopes exacerbate these processing challenges. Here, we introduce a 'reduced-resolution' beamforming approach to alleviate downstream processing requirements. Our approach, based on post-correlation beamforming, allows sensitivity to be traded against the number of beams needed to cover a given survey area. Using the MeerKAT and Murchison Widefield Array telescopes as examples, we show that survey speed can be vastly increased, and downstream signal processing requirements vastly decreased, if a moderate sacrifice to sensitivity is allowed. We show the reduced-resolution beamforming technique is intimately related to standard techniques used in synthesis imaging. We suggest that reduced-resolution beamforming should be considered to ease data processing challenges in current and planned searches; further, reduced-resolution beamforming may provide a path toward computationally-expensive search strategies previously considered infeasible.
High Energy Astrophysical Phenomena
What problem does this paper attempt to address?
### What problem does this paper attempt to solve? This paper aims to solve the problem of computational resource limitations in radio astronomy, especially in the search for pulsars and technosignatures. Specifically, the author introduced a "reduced - resolution beamforming" technique to reduce the computational cost of these search tasks. #### Main problems: 1. **Computational resource bottleneck**: Modern radio array telescopes generate a huge amount of data, resulting in a very large amount of computational resources required to process this data. Especially in the search for pulsars and technosignatures, it is necessary to search high - resolution data in a large parameter space, which places extremely high demands on computing power. 2. **Increasing the sky survey speed**: Traditional beamforming methods need to form a large number of beams to cover the entire sky survey area, which not only increases the computational complexity but also limits the sky survey speed. 3. **Balancing sensitivity and computational requirements**: In order to relieve the computational pressure, it is usually necessary to make a trade - off between sensitivity and computational requirements. Existing methods usually reduce the number of antennas participating in beamforming to reduce the computational cost, but this will lead to a decrease in sensitivity. #### Solutions: The paper proposes a low - resolution beamforming technique based on "post - correlation beamforming". By adjusting the weights of different baselines, the sensitivity can be sacrificed to a certain extent, thereby significantly reducing the number of required beams and greatly reducing the computational requirements for subsequent signal processing. This method can: - **Increase the sky survey speed**: By reducing the number of beams, a larger sky area can be covered more quickly. - **Reduce the computational cost**: Reduce the demand for high - performance computing resources, making some search strategies that were originally difficult to implement feasible. - **Flexibly adjust the sensitivity**: The balance between sensitivity and beam width can be flexibly adjusted according to actual needs, providing more options for different scientific goals. ### Formula summary The key formulas involved in the paper include: 1. **Beamforming voltage expression**: \[ b(t)=\sum_{p = 1}^{P}w_p(t)v_p(t) \] where \(w_p(t)\) is the weight and \(v_p(t)\) is the antenna voltage stream. 2. **Power beam expression**: \[ B=\langle b(t)b^*(t)\rangle=\sum_{p = 1}^{P}\sum_{q = 1}^{P}w_p\langle v_p(t)v_q^*(t)\rangle w_q^* \] or expressed in matrix form: \[ B = wVw^H \] where \(V\) is the visibility matrix and \(w^H\) is the conjugate transpose of the weight vector. 3. **Low - resolution beamforming sensitivity factor**: \[ f_S=\frac{\Delta S_{\text{post - x}}(D)}{\Delta S_{\text{post - x}}(d)}=\sqrt{\frac{2N'_{\text{baselines}}(d)+N_{\text{ant}}}{N_{\text{ant}}}} \] 4. **Point - source sky survey speed figure of merit (PFoM)**: \[ f_{\text{PFoM}}=\frac{PFoM(d)}{PFoM_{\text{full}}}=f_S^2\times f_{\text{FoV}} \] where \(f_{\text{FoV}}\) is the fraction of the instrument's field of view covered, which depends on the number of formed beams. Through these formulas and technical means, the paper demonstrates the potential of low - resolution beamforming technology in reducing computational costs and improving sky survey efficiency.