Strengths and Weaknesses of the ETSI Adaptive DCC Algorithm: A Proposal for Improvement

Ignacio Soto,Oscar Amador,Manuel Urueña,Maria Calderon

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1109/LCOMM.2019.2906178

2024-02-19

Abstract:This letter studies the adaptive Decentralized Congestion Control (DCC) algorithm defined in the ETSI TS 102 687 V1.2.1 specification. We provide insights on the parameters used in the algorithm and explore the impact of those parameters on its performance. We show how the algorithm achieves good average medium utilization while protecting against congestion, but we also show how the chosen parameters can result in slow speed of convergence and long periods of unfairness in transitory situations. Finally, we propose a modification to the algorithm which results in significant improvements in speed of convergence and fairness.

Networking and Internet Architecture

What problem does this paper attempt to address?

This paper primarily investigates the advantages and disadvantages of the European Telecommunications Standards Institute (ETSI) Adaptive Distributed Congestion Control (DCC) algorithm and proposes an improved solution. The DCC algorithm aims to avoid wireless channel congestion in the 5.9 GHz frequency band for vehicle-to-vehicle communication. The research reveals that although the algorithm performs well in terms of average channel utilization and congestion prevention, it may suffer from slow convergence speed and unfairness during transition states.

The authors analyze the impact of parameters in the algorithm on performance and point out that parameter selection may lead to these issues. They propose a modified algorithm called Dual-αDCC to enhance convergence speed and fairness by dynamically adjusting the parameter α. The new algorithm uses two different α values based on the increase or decrease of the δ value, thus addressing the slow convergence speed in high utilization scenarios and the fairness issue when merging different groups of vehicles, while maintaining a close approximation to the target channel busy rate (CBR t).

Through numerical analysis and simulation experiments, the paper demonstrates significant improvements in convergence speed and fairness of the Dual-αDCC algorithm compared to the original ETSI DCC algorithm. For example, when a different number of vehicles start sending, the Dual-αDCC algorithm achieves convergence in only 25% to 35% of the time required by the ETSI DCC algorithm. Additionally, in the case of merging vehicle groups, it achieves faster and fairer channel sharing.

In conclusion, this paper identifies the limitations of the ETSI DCC algorithm and proposes an improved algorithm to optimize the performance of vehicle communication networks.