Abstract:Recent work has showcased the powerful capability of large language models (LLMs) in recalling knowledge and reasoning. However, the reliability of LLMs in combining these two capabilities into reasoning through multi-hop facts has not been widely explored. This paper systematically investigates the possibilities for LLMs to utilize shortcuts based on direct connections between the initial and terminal entities of multi-hop knowledge. We first explore the existence of factual shortcuts through Knowledge Neurons, revealing that: (i) the strength of factual shortcuts is highly correlated with the frequency of co-occurrence of initial and terminal entities in the pre-training corpora; (ii) few-shot prompting leverage more shortcuts in answering multi-hop questions compared to chain-of-thought prompting. Then, we analyze the risks posed by factual shortcuts from the perspective of multi-hop knowledge editing. Analysis shows that approximately 20% of the failures are attributed to shortcuts, and the initial and terminal entities in these failure instances usually have higher co-occurrences in the pre-training corpus. Finally, we propose erasing shortcut neurons to mitigate the associated risks and find that this approach significantly reduces failures in multiple-hop knowledge editing caused by shortcuts.

What problem does this paper attempt to address?

This paper aims to explore the possibility of large - language models (LLMs) using factual shortcuts when dealing with multi - hop knowledge problems and their potential risks. Specifically, the paper focuses on the following points: 1. **Research Background**: - Large - language models (such as ChatGPT and LLaMA - 2) show strong capabilities in knowledge recall and reasoning. - However, the reliability of these models when combining multiple facts for reasoning has not been fully explored. 2. **Research Questions**: - **Existence of Multi - Hop Factual Shortcuts**: The paper first explores whether there are factual shortcuts in multi - hop knowledge, that is, whether the model quickly arrives at an answer by directly connecting the initial entity and the terminal entity instead of step - by - step reasoning. - **Impact of Shortcuts**: Analyze the impact of these shortcuts on multi - hop knowledge editing, especially the problem of answer inconsistency that may be caused by shortcuts after knowledge update. - **Risk Assessment**: Evaluate the potential risks of multi - hop factual shortcuts in knowledge editing and propose mitigation strategies. 3. **Research Methods**: - **Frequency Analysis**: Explore the formation mechanism of shortcuts by analyzing the co - occurrence frequency of the initial entity and the terminal entity in the pre - training corpus. - **Neuron Activation Analysis**: Use the Knowledge Neurons (KN) method to quantify the difference in reasoning patterns between multi - hop problems and single - hop problems. - **Experimental Verification**: Verify the use of shortcuts for multi - hop problems under different prompting methods (such as few - shot prompting and chain - of - thought prompting) through experiments. 4. **Main Findings**: - **Relationship between Shortcuts and Co - occurrence Frequency**: The strength of multi - hop factual shortcuts is highly correlated with the co - occurrence frequency of the initial entity and the terminal entity in the pre - training corpus. - **Comparison between Few - Shot Prompting and Chain - of - Thought Prompting**: Few - shot prompting is more likely to use shortcuts than chain - of - thought prompting. - **Risks of Shortcuts**: Approximately 20% of multi - hop knowledge editing failures are attributed to shortcuts, especially when the co - occurrence frequency of the initial and terminal entities is high. 5. **Solutions**: - **Eliminating Shortcuts**: By erasing neurons related to shortcuts, significantly reduce the failure rate in multi - hop knowledge editing and improve the success rate of editing. In conclusion, this paper systematically studies the phenomenon of large - language models using shortcuts in multi - hop knowledge reasoning and proposes corresponding risk assessment and mitigation measures. This provides an important reference for future research and helps to improve the ability and reliability of multi - hop reasoning.

Investigating Multi-Hop Factual Shortcuts in Knowledge Editing of Large Language Models

Enhancing Multi-hop Reasoning through Knowledge Erasure in Large Language Model Editing

Locate-then-edit for Multi-hop Factual Recall under Knowledge Editing

Do LLMs Overcome Shortcut Learning? An Evaluation of Shortcut Challenges in Large Language Models

Unveiling Factual Recall Behaviors of Large Language Models through Knowledge Neurons

Retrieval-enhanced Knowledge Editing in Language Models for Multi-Hop Question Answering

Break the Chain: Large Language Models Can be Shortcut Reasoners

Do Large Language Models Perform Latent Multi-Hop Reasoning without Exploiting Shortcuts?

Multilingual Knowledge Editing with Language-Agnostic Factual Neurons

Neighboring Perturbations of Knowledge Editing on Large Language Models

Multi-Hop Knowledge Graph Reasoning with Reward Shaping

Uncovering Overfitting in Large Language Model Editing

LLM-Based Multi-Hop Question Answering with Knowledge Graph Integration in Evolving Environments

Multi-hop Knowledge Reasoning with Deep Reinforcement Learning

MQuAKE: Assessing Knowledge Editing in Language Models via Multi-Hop Questions

Roadblocks for Temporarily Disabling Shortcuts and Learning New Knowledge

DeepEdit: Knowledge Editing as Decoding with Constraints

Towards CausalGPT: A Multi-Agent Approach for Faithful Knowledge Reasoning via Promoting Causal Consistency in LLMs

Causal Reasoning in Large Language Models: A Knowledge Graph Approach

Prompting Large Language Models with Knowledge Graphs for Question Answering Involving Long-tail Facts

KnowledgeNavigator: Leveraging Large Language Models for Enhanced Reasoning over Knowledge Graph