Abstract:Statistical crop modeling is pivotal for understanding climate impacts on crop yields. Choices of models matter: Linear regression is interpretable but limited in predictive power; machine learning predicts well but often remains a black box. To develop explainable artificial intelligence (AI) for exploring historical crop yield data and predicting crop yield, here we reported a Bayesian ensemble model (BM) that is interpretable with great explanatory and predictive power. BM embraces many competitive models via Bayesian model averaging, fits complex functions, and quantifies model uncertainty. Long-term crop yields are driven by both climate and technology; the common practice of first detrending and then analyzing the detrended data has an incorrigible bias. Therefore, BM was also aimed at decomposing historical yield data to jointly estimate technological trends and climate effects on crop yield. We compared BM with ElasticNet, Neural Network, MARS, SVM, Random Forests, and XGBoost. BM excelled at both predicting and explaining. When tested on synthetic data, BM was the only method unveiling the true relationships: BM has stronger interpretability; other methods predicted well but for wrong reasons. When tested on maize yield data in Ohio, BM detected two technological shifts, attributable to hybrid corn adoption in the 1940′s and the technological slowing-down in the 1970′s: No other methods detected such changepoints. BM derived nonlinear asymmetric crop responses to climate and non-negligible temperature-precipitation interacting effects, with patterns consistent with theoretical or experimental evidence. Extrapolation of all the models for future yield prediction was highly uncertain, but BM provided more reliable predictions under novel climate whereas Random Forests and XGBoost proved unsuitable for extrapolation. Overall, BM provided new insights unattainable by the existing black-box methods. We caution against blind use of black-box machine learning for statistical crop modeling and call for more efforts to apply interpretable machine learning for mechanistic understandings of crop-climate interactions.

Challenging the Black Box: A Comprehensive Evaluation of Attribution Maps of CNN Applications in Agriculture and Forestry

Application of Convolutional Neural Network on Lei Bamboo Above-Ground-Biomass (AGB) Estimation Using Worldview-2

Opening the Black Box of Neural Networks: Methods for Interpreting Neural Network Models in Clinical Applications

Enhanced Infield Agriculture with Interpretable Machine Learning Approaches for Crop Classification

Feature CAM: Interpretable AI in Image Classification

CAManim: Animating end-to-end network activation maps

Evaluating explainable artificial intelligence methods for multi-label deep learning classification tasks in remote sensing

Better Understanding Differences in Attribution Methods via Systematic Evaluations

Advancing Attribution-Based Neural Network Explainability through Relative Absolute Magnitude Layer-Wise Relevance Propagation and Multi-Component Evaluation

An illustration of model agnostic explainability methods applied to environmental data

How can we quantify, explain, and apply the uncertainty of complex soil maps predicted with neural networks?

Analysis of Explainers of Black Box Deep Neural Networks for Computer Vision: A Survey

Crown-CAM: Interpretable Visual Explanations for Tree Crown Detection in Aerial Images

LaFAM: Unsupervised Feature Attribution with Label-free Activation Maps

Toward Understanding the Disagreement Problem in Neural Network Feature Attribution

Crop yield prediction via explainable AI and interpretable machine learning: Dangers of black box models for evaluating climate change impacts on crop yield

Overview of Class Activation Maps for Visualization Explainability

Explainability of Deep Networks for SAR Target Recognition via Class Activation Mapping

Reliable Evaluation of Attribution Maps in CNNs: A Perturbation-Based Approach

Interactive Explainable Anomaly Detection for Industrial Settings