Abstract:Understanding how misinformation affects the spread of disease is crucial for public health, especially given recent research indicating that misinformation can increase vaccine hesitancy and discourage vaccine uptake. However, it is difficult to investigate the interaction between misinformation and epidemic outcomes due to the dearth of data-informed holistic epidemic models. Here, we employ an epidemic model that incorporates a large, mobility-informed physical contact network as well as the distribution of misinformed individuals across counties derived from social media data. The model allows us to simulate and estimate various scenarios to understand the impact of misinformation on epidemic spreading. Using this model, we present a worst-case scenario in which a heavily misinformed population would result in an additional 14% of the U.S. population becoming infected over the course of the COVID-19 epidemic, compared to a best-case scenario.

What problem does this paper attempt to address?

The problem that this paper attempts to solve is **to understand how misinformation affects the spread of diseases**. Specifically, the author focuses on how the spread of misinformation exacerbates the large - scale spread of diseases in the modern social media environment, especially the impact of vaccine hesitancy and the decline in vaccination rates caused by misinformation on epidemic control. By constructing an epidemic model that combines social network data and physical contact networks, the author aims to quantify the specific impact of misinformation on the spread of the epidemic, thereby providing data support for public health strategies. ### Analysis of the Core Problems in the Paper 1. **The Relationship between Misinformation and Disease Spread**: - The paper explores how misinformation accelerates the spread of diseases by influencing public behavior (such as reducing social distancing, not wearing masks, refusing to be vaccinated, etc.). - The author uses an extended SIR model (called the SMIR model), in which the factor of "misinformation" is introduced to simulate the impact of different levels of misinformation on the spread of the epidemic. 2. **Model Construction**: - **Social Network Data**: Using data from Twitter, an information dissemination network is constructed, which includes the dissemination paths of misinformation. - **Physical Contact Network**: Using mobile phone movement data and demographic data, a physical contact network is constructed to simulate the actual spread paths of diseases. - **SMIR Model**: On the basis of the standard SIR model, the dimension of "misinformation" is added, and the infection rates and recovery rates of the general population and the population affected by misinformation are considered respectively. 3. **Main Findings**: - **The Impact of Misinformation**: In the worst - case scenario, the highly misinformation - affected population will cause an additional 14% of the US population to be infected, which is equivalent to about 47 million people. - **The Impact of Homogeneity**: Increased homogeneity (that is, increased interaction within the misinformation group) can protect the general population, but will significantly increase the infection rate within the misinformation group. - **Spread Speed**: The wide spread of misinformation not only increases the number of infected people, but also accelerates the peak time of the epidemic, making it arrive about two weeks earlier. ### Conclusion This study constructs a model that can quantify the impact of misinformation on the spread of the epidemic by combining social network data and physical contact networks. The research results show that the wide spread of misinformation not only increases the number of infected people, but also accelerates the development of the epidemic. These findings provide important references for public health departments and social media platforms, emphasizing the importance of controlling the spread of misinformation, especially during the epidemic.

Modeling the amplification of epidemic spread by misinformed populations

Effect of homophily and correlation of beliefs on COVID-19 and general infectious disease outbreaks

Modeling Epidemics Spreading on Social Contact Networks

How do social media and individual behaviors affect epidemic transmission and control?

Modeling the interplay between disease spread, behaviors, and disease perception with a data-driven approach

Kinetic compartmental models driven by opinion dynamics: Vaccine hesitancy and social influence

Interplay of epidemic spreading and vaccine uptake under complex social contagion

Media-driven adaptive behavior in pandemic modeling and data analysis

Epidemic modeling for misinformation spread in digital networks through a social intelligence approach

Modeling the heterogeneous disease-behavior-information dynamics during epidemics

Epidemic modelling requires knowledge of the social network

Impact of opinion formation phenomena in epidemic dynamics: kinetic modeling on networks

Modeling human mobility responses to the large-scale spreading of infectious diseases

Verifying Infectious Disease Scenario Planning for Geographically Diverse Populations

Exploring the Effect of Misinformation on Infectious Disease Transmission

Modelling the mitigation of anti-vaccine opinion propagation to suppress epidemic spread: A computational approach

Metapopulation network models for understanding, predicting and managing the coronavirus disease COVID-19

Social norm dynamics in a behavioral epidemic model

Get the News Out Loudly and Quickly: Modeling the Influence of the Media on Limiting Infectious Disease Outbreaks

A Polarized Temporal Network Model to Study the Spread of Recurrent Epidemic Diseases in a Partially Vaccinated Population