Numerical analysis of physics-informed neural networks and related models in physics-informed machine learning

Tim De Ryck,Siddhartha Mishra
2024-01-30
Abstract:Physics-informed neural networks (PINNs) and their variants have been very popular in recent years as algorithms for the numerical simulation of both forward and inverse problems for partial differential equations. This article aims to provide a comprehensive review of currently available results on the numerical analysis of PINNs and related models that constitute the backbone of physics-informed machine learning. We provide a unified framework in which analysis of the various components of the error incurred by PINNs in approximating PDEs can be effectively carried out. A detailed review of available results on approximation, generalization and training errors and their behavior with respect to the type of the PDE and the dimension of the underlying domain is presented. In particular, the role of the regularity of the solutions and their stability to perturbations in the error analysis is elucidated. Numerical results are also presented to illustrate the theory. We identify training errors as a key bottleneck which can adversely affect the overall performance of various models in physics-informed machine learning.
Numerical Analysis,Machine Learning
What problem does this paper attempt to address?
This paper focuses on the numerical analysis of Physics-Informed Neural Networks (PINNs) and related models in physical information machine learning. The authors aim to provide a unified framework for analyzing the errors introduced by PINNs in approximating partial differential equation (PDE) solutions, and examine in detail the approximation, stability, generalization, training errors, and their relationships with PDE types and underlying domain dimensions. The paper also emphasizes the training error as a key bottleneck that affects various model performance, and demonstrates it through numerical results. In addition, the paper mentions other physical information learning models beyond PINNs, such as Variation-Form based PINNs (VPINNs), weak-form PINNs (wPINNs), and the deep Ritz method. Overall, the purpose of this paper is to comprehensively review the numerical analysis of PINNs and related models to determine their applicability and limitations.