Abstract:Large Language Models (LLMs) excel in generating personalized content and facilitating interactive dialogues, showcasing their remarkable aptitude for a myriad of applications. However, their capabilities in reasoning and providing explainable outputs, especially within the context of reasoning abilities, remain areas for improvement. In this study, we delve into the reasoning abilities of LLMs, highlighting the current challenges and limitations that hinder their effectiveness in complex reasoning scenarios.

What problem does this paper attempt to address?

The problem that this paper attempts to solve is the deficiencies of large - language models (LLMs) in reasoning ability and providing interpretable outputs. Although LLMs are excellent at generating personalized content and facilitating interactive conversations, their performance still needs to be improved in tasks requiring complex reasoning abilities, such as understanding causal relationships, logical reasoning, and complex problem - solving. This not only affects the reliability of LLMs in the decision - making process but also raises concerns about their transparency and the credibility of their outputs. Specifically, the paper focuses on the following aspects: 1. **Limitations of reasoning ability**: The paper explores the challenges and limitations of current LLMs in reasoning tasks, especially when dealing with tasks requiring advanced reasoning abilities, such as understanding causal relationships and logical reasoning. 2. **Interpretability**: Besides reasoning ability, the paper also emphasizes the deficiencies of LLMs in providing interpretable outputs. This makes it difficult for users to understand the decision - making process of the model, thereby reducing the trust in the model. 3. **Method improvement**: To overcome these challenges, the paper proposes a multi - faceted improvement method, including parameter - efficient fine - tuning techniques and advanced prompting strategies. In particular, a new model - ReasonAlpaca is introduced. This model is fine - tuned by the low - rank adaptation (LoRA) technique and trained with a specialized instruction - following dataset to enhance its reasoning performance. 4. **Evaluation and verification**: Through a series of strict evaluations, the paper shows a significant improvement in the reasoning accuracy of ReasonAlpaca, proving the effectiveness of the proposed method. In conclusion, this paper aims to improve the performance of LLMs in complex reasoning tasks by improving the model architecture and training methods, making them more reliable and transparent.

Case Study: Testing Model Capabilities in Some Reasoning Tasks

Concise and Organized Perception Facilitates Large Language Models for Deductive Reasoning.

Can Large Language Models Reason? A Characterization via 3-SAT

When Do Program-of-Thought Works for Reasoning?

LLMs for Relational Reasoning: How Far are We?

Are Large Language Models Really Good Logical Reasoners? A Comprehensive Evaluation and Beyond

CLR-Fact: Evaluating the Complex Logical Reasoning Capability of Large Language Models over Factual Knowledge

LogicAsker: Evaluating and Improving the Logical Reasoning Ability of Large Language Models

Evaluating Causal Reasoning Capabilities of Large Language Models: A Systematic Analysis Across Three Scenarios

Reasoning or a Semblance of it? A Diagnostic Study of Transitive Reasoning in LLMs

LogicBench: Towards Systematic Evaluation of Logical Reasoning Ability of Large Language Models

Explore the Reasoning Capability of LLMs in the Chess Testbed

Evaluating the Deductive Competence of Large Language Models

Can Large Language Models Act as Symbolic Reasoners?

Towards Reasoning in Large Language Models: A Survey

Concise and Organized Perception Facilitates Reasoning in Large Language Models

Are Your LLMs Capable of Stable Reasoning?

Reasoning Abilities of Large Language Models: In-Depth Analysis on the Abstraction and Reasoning Corpus

"I'd Like to Have an Argument, Please": Argumentative Reasoning in Large Language Models

CLR-Bench: Evaluating Large Language Models in College-level Reasoning