Understanding the Opportunity-Centric Accessibility for Public Charging Infrastructure

Hossein Gazmeh,Yuntao Guo,Xinwu Qian

2024-02-15

Abstract:In this study, we utilize data from over 28,000 public charging stations (PCSs) and 5.5 million points of interest across twenty U.S. metropolitan areas to underscore the importance of considering the availability of opportunities when assessing accessibility to PCSs, rather than relying solely on spatial proximity. Specifically, we conduct comprehensive comparisons of opportunity-centric accessibility measures with distance-based measures and perform counterfactual analyses under various PCS deployment strategies. Our findings reveal significant inequalities in PCS access across different neighborhoods under distance-based and opportunity-centric measures. However, a greater disparity exists when considering opportunities, with high-income communities having significantly better access to PCSs. Counterfactual analyses suggest that equitable deployment based on distance measures result in the least equitable outcomes when considering opportunities, primarily due to the existing disparity in opportunity distributions in our cities. Our insights highlight the complexity of locating PCSs and can guide nationwide PCS deployment for long-term societal benefits.

Physics and Society

What problem does this paper attempt to address?

### Problems the Paper Attempts to Solve

This paper aims to explore how to evaluate the effectiveness and efficiency of public charging infrastructure (PCS). Specifically, the authors argue that traditional distance-based accessibility metrics may not adequately address the unique challenges of accessing public charging stations (PCS). Therefore, the paper emphasizes that the availability of opportunities near charging stations should be considered when assessing PCS accessibility.

### Main Research Questions

1. **How accurately do traditional distance-based accessibility metrics describe the performance of public charging infrastructure?**
2. **What additional perspectives related to charging behavior should be included in the evaluation and deployment of charging facilities, and what are the shortcomings of traditional methods in these areas?**
3. **How can new accessibility metrics inspired by charging behavior be developed to quantitatively assess the performance of charging facility deployment, and what additional insights do these new metrics provide beyond traditional accessibility understanding?**
4. **How can counterfactual analysis be used, combining existing and newly proposed metrics, to quantitatively evaluate the deployment of charging stations in the United States?**

### Research Background

- **Proliferation of Electric Vehicles (EVs)**: Global EV sales grew from 1 million in 2017 to 10 million in 2022. State and federal governments in the United States are pushing to achieve the goal of 500,000 EV chargers by 2030.
- **Importance of Public Charging Infrastructure**: Although many EV users can charge at home, a significant portion relies on public charging stations, especially in densely populated urban areas.
- **Uniqueness of Charging Behavior**: Charging is often not the primary travel decision but an incidental activity to daily routines. Therefore, assessing the accessibility of charging stations should consider not only physical distance but also the availability of activities near the charging stations.

### Data Sources and Processing

- **Data Sources**:
- **AFDC Public Charging Station Locator**: Contains data on over 65,000 public charging stations and 170,000 electric vehicle supply equipment (EVSE).
- **American Community Survey Data**: Provides data on community population and income status.
- **SafeGraph Points of Interest Data**: Contains information on over 18.5 million locations, including brand affiliations, category tags, and North American Industry Classification System (NAICS) codes.

- **Data Processing**:
- **Selection of Major Urban Areas**: The study focuses on 20 major metropolitan areas with relatively dense charging infrastructure.
- **Filtering Activity Types**: Multiple filters are used to select points of interest (POI) related to charging activities, excluding business categories and locations unrelated to charging.

### Methods

- **Accessibility Metrics**:
- **Gravity Model**: Used to quantify the accessibility of public charging stations to community block groups (CBG).
- **Opportunity-Centric Metrics**: Introduces new dimensions to capture the unique characteristics of charging events and evaluate the performance of existing charging infrastructure.

- **Counterfactual Analysis**: Evaluates the effects of different charging infrastructure deployment strategies to guide the design and optimization of future charging networks.

### Conclusion

Through comprehensive analysis, the paper reveals the inequality in the accessibility of public charging stations and proposes new evaluation metrics to better guide the deployment of charging stations and policy design. These findings are significant for ensuring the fairness and effectiveness of charging infrastructure.