What Large-Scale Publication and Citation Data Tell Us About International Research Collaboration in Europe: Changing National Patterns in Global Contexts

Marek Kwiek

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/03075079.2020.1749254

2023-12-09

Abstract:This study analyzes the unprecedented growth of international research collaboration (IRC) in Europe during the period 2009-2018 in terms of coauthorship and citation distribution of globally indexed publications. The results reveal the dynamics of this change, as growing IRC moves European systems away from institutional collaboration, with stable and strong national collaboration. Domestic output has remained flat. The growth in publications in major European systems is almost entirely attributable to internationally coauthored papers. A comparison of trends within the four complementary collaboration modes clearly reveals that the growth of European science is driven solely by internationally co-authored papers. With the emergence of global network science, which diminishes the role of national policies in IRC and foregrounds the role of scientists, the individual scientists willingness to collaborate internationally is central to advancing IRC in Europe. Scientists collaborate internationally when it enhances their academic prestige, scientific recognition, and access to research funding, as indicated by the credibility cycle, prestige maximization, and global science models. The study encompassed 5.5 million Scopus-indexed articles, including 2.2 million involving international collaboration.

Digital Libraries

What problem does this paper attempt to address?

This paper explores the unprecedented growth of international research collaboration (IRC) in Europe from 2009 to 2018. The author, Marek Kwiek, points out that with the growth of IRC, the European scientific system is shifting from predominantly institutional and national collaboration to more transnational collaboration. The study finds that domestic output remains relatively unchanged, while the growth in publications from major European systems is largely attributable to international collaborative papers. The paper compares the trends of four complementary modes of collaboration, demonstrating that the development of European science is driven by international collaborative papers.

The paper emphasizes that the rise of global network science weakens the role of national policies in IRC, and scientists' personal pursuit of international collaboration to enhance academic reputation and access research funding becomes key to the growth of IRC. Scientists tend to collaborate with top colleagues worldwide to enhance their academic prestige and resources.

The study also reveals the differences between the EU-15 and EU-13, namely the disparities between old and new member states in IRC and its impacts. The growth of IRC in Europe is partly attributed to national and EU-level policy promotion and funding, but individual scientists' pursuit of reputation and resources also plays an important role.

In addition, IRC has become a measure of excellence and quality in the European research field, serving as a key criterion for academic promotion and determining the opportunities for individuals and institutions to obtain national and European research funding. Technological advances, such as the convenience of electronic communication and the reduction of travel costs, have also facilitated the development of IRC.

The paper focuses on the growth of IRC in Europe and the citation advantage in different scientific fields by analyzing data from 5.5 million papers in the Scopus database. The study finds that international collaborative papers dominate academic publications in Europe and have an increasing association with high-impact journals, reflecting scientists' inclination to seek collaboration with global elites in their personal career development.