Editorial: Cryptocurrency Transaction Analysis from a Network Perspective
Xiao Fan Liu,Cüneyt Gürcan Akcora,Zhongyuan Zhang,Jianguo Liu
DOI: https://doi.org/10.3389/fphy.2022.876983
IF: 3.718
2022-01-01
Frontiers in Physics
Abstract:The past 2 years have seen a surge of research articles themed on cryptocurrency analytics [1].We are glad that our research topic, Cryptocurrency Transaction Analysis from a Network Perspective, which consists of nine novel contributions, can join this exciting trend and has already drawn attention from academia and industry. There are two common data sources available for cryptocurrency analytics. The first is blockchain data. Public blockchains, such as Bitcoin and Ethereum, store transactions transparently in an open database. With a bit of effort unpacking the transactions from a compact storage format, one can readily use network science methods and machine learning tools to mine for knowledge, be it regulatory intelligence or market signal. The second is market information. The quotation ticks and trading volumes of the 10,000 + cryptocurrencies and tokens traded in many centralized and decentralized exchanges are curated by market monitoring sites like coinmarketcap. These data enable insightful research of the cryptocurrency market’s risk and potential market manipulation activities. Articles in our research topic cover both lines of work with significant findings. A fundamental property of cryptocurrency systems’ public-key-private-key design is that the pseudonyms, i.e., blockchain addresses, recorded in the database cannot be associated with any physical identity, such as an IP address or email address. However, various heuristic algorithms have been proposed to “link” addresses together, that is, to associate multiple blockchain addresses to the same holder. Fischer et al. integrated a spectrum of address-linking algorithms and used a network-based clustering method to synthesize a new method that can reliably associate the addresses. Another fundamental property of blockchain data is traceability, i.e., one can trace the genuine money flow through a chain of addresses. Naturally, crypto services that deliberately obfuscate such traceability, also known as mixing services, have been created for laundering (often illicit) money. Liu et al. proposed a conceptual modeling framework to analyze the different roles of blockchain addresses in the bitcoin mixing services. Their model helped find and characterize the organizer, soldiers, and communicators in a money laundering case study. The cryptocurrency transactions can be viewed as a complex network in which the blockchain addresses are the nodes, and the money flow in the transactions are the edges linking the nodes. As a constantly expanding network, physicists are interested in the underlying mechanism of its growth. Preferential attachment [2] is one of the most prominent governing growth mechanisms of many natural andman-made complex networks, as well as bitcoin [3]. Collibus et al. showed that Ethereum and its most market-capitalized ERC-20 token habitants Binance, USDT, and Chainlink also obey such law, but with a super-linear variance. Edited and reviewed by: Matjaž Perc, University of Maribor, Slovenia