LLMs Among Us: Generative AI Participating in Digital Discourse

Kristina Radivojevic,Nicholas Clark,Paul Brenner
2024-02-09
Abstract:The emergence of Large Language Models (LLMs) has great potential to reshape the landscape of many social media platforms. While this can bring promising opportunities, it also raises many threats, such as biases and privacy concerns, and may contribute to the spread of propaganda by malicious actors. We developed the "LLMs Among Us" experimental framework on top of the Mastodon social media platform for bot and human participants to communicate without knowing the ratio or nature of bot and human participants. We built 10 personas with three different LLMs, GPT-4, LLama 2 Chat, and Claude. We conducted three rounds of the experiment and surveyed participants after each round to measure the ability of LLMs to pose as human participants without human detection. We found that participants correctly identified the nature of other users in the experiment only 42% of the time despite knowing the presence of both bots and humans. We also found that the choice of persona had substantially more impact on human perception than the choice of mainstream LLMs.
Artificial Intelligence,Computers and Society,Social and Information Networks
What problem does this paper attempt to address?
This paper discusses the potential impact of large language models (LLMs) in social media, specifically how they may reshape the landscape of social platforms while also bringing biases, privacy concerns, and the potential for malicious actors to exploit them for propaganda dissemination. The research team created an experimental framework called "LLMs Among Us" on the Mastodon platform, allowing human and robot participants to interact without knowing the proportion or nature of each other's identities. They built 10 virtual identities using three different LLMs (GPT-4, LLama 2 Chat, and Claude) and conducted three rounds of experiments to investigate the participants' ability to identify whether other users were robots. The experimental results show that although participants were aware of the presence of robots, they were only able to correctly identify 42% of user identities. The study also found that the choice of virtual identity has a much greater impact on human perception than the choice of mainstream LLM. The paper suggests that as LLMs develop, they may engage in discussions more realistically and even manipulate information dissemination and digital conversations, raising concerns about privacy, ethics, and security. Through analysis, the authors found no significant differences in performance among different LLM models in the experiments, but the choice of virtual identity had a greater impact on human judgment. The paper also cites past research on how social media robots influence political discussions and public opinion, emphasizing the potential dangers of LLMs. The research results indicate that even with knowledge of the existence of robots, people have difficulty accurately distinguishing between human and robot participants, highlighting the need for better understanding and management of the risks posed by these technologies.