Abstract:The main goal of this work is to test the results of a methodological improvement in the measurement of the magnification bias signal on a sample of submillimeter galaxies. In particular, we investigate the constraining power of cosmological parameters within the Lambda CDM model. We also discuss important points that can affect the results. We measured the angular cross-correlation function between a sample of foreground GAMA II galaxies in a single wide spectroscopic redshift bin of $0.2<z<0.8$ and a sample of background submillimeter galaxies from Herschel-ATLAS. We focused on the photometric redshift range of $1.2<z<4.0,$ with an improved methodological framework. Interpreting the weak lensing signal within the halo model formalism and performing a Markov chain Monte Carlo (MCMC) algorithm, we obtained the posterior distribution of both the halo occupation distribution and cosmological parameters within a flat Lambda CDM model. Our analysis was also performed with additional galaxy clustering information via a foreground angular auto-correlation function. We observed an overall remarkable improvement in terms of uncertainties in both the halo occupation distribution and cosmological parameters with respect to previous results. A priori knowledge about beta , the logarithmic slope of the background integral number counts, is found to be paramount to derive constraints on $ when using the cross-correlation data alone. Assuming a physically motivated prior distribution for beta , we obtain mean values of $ $ and $ $ and an unconstrained distribution for the Hubble constant. These results are likely to suffer from sampling variance, since one of the fields, G15, appears to have an anomalous behavior with a systematically higher cross-correlation. We find that removing it from the sample yields mean values of $ $ and $ $ and, for the first time, a (loose) restriction of the Hubble constant is obtained via this observable: $h=0.79^ $. The addition of the angular auto-correlation of the foreground sample in a joint analysis tightens the constraints, but also reveals a discrepancy between both observables that might be an aggravated consequence of sampling variance or due to the presence of unmodeled aspects on small and intermediate scales.

Impact of assembly bias on clustering plus weak lensing cosmological analysis

Impact of assembly bias on clustering plus weak lensing cosmological analysis

The effects of assembly bias on cosmological inference from galaxy-galaxy lensing and galaxy clusters

Introducing Decorated HODs: modeling assembly bias in the galaxy-halo connection

How are galaxies assigned to halos? Searching for assembly bias in the SDSS galaxy clustering

Testing the framework of the halo occupation distribution with assembly bias modeling and empirical extensions

Dissecting and Modelling Galaxy Assembly Bias

KiDS-1000: Combined halo-model cosmology constraints from galaxy abundance, galaxy clustering and galaxy-galaxy lensing

How to Optimally Constrain Galaxy Assembly Bias: Supplement Projected Correlation Functions with Count-in-cells Statistics

The Effects of Halo Assembly Bias on Self-Calibration in Galaxy Cluster Surveys

Impact of tidal environment on galaxy clustering in GAMA

The Impact of Assembly Bias on the Galaxy Content of Dark Matter Halos

The DESI One-Percent Survey: Evidence for Assembly Bias from Low-Redshift Counts-in-Cylinders Measurements

Strong Conformity and Assembly Bias: Towards a Physical Understanding of the Galaxy-Halo Connection in SDSS Clusters

Methodological refinement of the submillimeter galaxy magnification bias. I. Cosmological analysis with a single redshift bin

The impact of assembly bias on the halo occupation in hydrodynamical simulations

Mapping the galaxy-halo connection to the galaxy bias: implication to the HOD-informed prior

Euclid Preparation. XL. Impact of magnification on spectroscopic galaxy clustering

Impact of cosmology dependence of baryonic feedback in weak lensing

The Hierarchical Cosmic Web and Assembly Bias