Abstract:Sharp tip nanoindentation of glassy polymers is a constrained, localized viscoelastoplastic deformation. We interpret this complexity, in terms of the well-understood uniaxial deformation. From the uniaxial compression data in the literature, for PMMA, PC and crosslinked SU-8, we obtain their universal, yield-normalized recovery curves, with eps*=eps/eps_y, being one measure of the corresponding strain states (CSS). Nanoindentation recovery is determined from the 2sec constant rate unloading h-P data, modeled by a generalized power-law (variable power exponent). Comparing these data-sets, yields the correlation coefficient between the notional nanoindentation strain rate epsdot_N and strain and true strain rate and strain, c=epsdot_N/epsdot_t=eps_N/eps_t. The equivalent strain, eps, and the c value for any polymer, are within a narrow range, from the onset of indentation. Combining residual profiles via scanning probe microscopy with mathematical modeling of the indenter tip, provides the strain distribution beneath the tip. CSS measures examined here, indicate polymer-specific regions to regions common to glassy polymers, which are reached very early in the nanoindentation.

What problem does this paper attempt to address?

The paper mainly discusses the analytical method of complex deformation phenomena in the nanoindentation process of glassy polymer nanocomposites, especially by transforming this multi-axial, localized, and constrained deformation into a more easily understandable uniaxial deformation. The researchers analyzed the uniaxial compression data of polymethyl methacrylate (PMMA), polycarbonate (PC), and crosslinked SU-8 polymers to obtain their general recovery curves and introduced the concept of equivalent uniaxial strain and strain rate. In the paper, the authors first pointed out the potential of nanoindentation technique in measuring material mechanical properties across different scales, but also emphasized the complexity of its deformation response. They proposed that by comparing the unloading data of nanoindentation and the dataset of uniaxial compression, the correlation coefficient between the nanoindentation strain rate and the true strain and strain rate could be obtained. By measuring the residual morphology with a scanning probe microscope and combining mathematical modeling, the strain distribution below the probe tip can be determined. The focus of the study is to explain the non-uniform deformation of glassy polymer nanoindentation, especially the phenomenon where the instantaneous equivalent uniaxial strain is greater than the yield strain. Through this method, they were able to correlate nanoindentation and uniaxial compression behavior, providing a new perspective for understanding and predicting the nanoindentation deformation of polymers, which is of significant importance for the development of more accurate finite element analysis or other simulation methods. In addition, the paper also introduces experimental materials and methods, including the preparation of polymer samples, nanoindentation experiments, and the use of scanning probe microscopy to obtain recovery and residual deformation data. With these data, the researchers established the relationship between nanoindentation deformation and uniaxial compression deformation, thus gaining an in-depth understanding of the actual physical phenomena in the nanoindentation process.

Uniaxial Recovery Perspective of Glassy Polymer Nanoindentation

Physical phenomena during nanoindentation deformation of amorphous glassy polymers

Aging-dependent Strain Localization in Amorphous Glassy Polymers: from Necking to Shear Banding

Physically-based Interpretation of Abnormal Stress Relaxation Response in Glassy Polymers

Effect of Viscous Behavior on Young's Modulus Estimation of Thermoplastic Glassy Polymers via Nanoindentation

Unravelling Physical Origin of the Bauschinger Effect in Glassy Polymers

Modeling nano-indentation tests of glassy polymers using finite elements with strain gradient plasticity

Assessing Young's modulus of poly (methyl methacrylate) using nanoindentation: Unraveling ambiguities

High Strain Gradient Plasticity Associated with Wedge Indentation into Face-Centered Cubic Single Crystals: Geometrically Necessary Dislocation Densities

Viscoelastic Moduli and Path-Dependent Hardness Across Four Decades of Timescale in Semicrystalline Polymers from Berkovich Nanoindentation

Measurement of Segmental Mobility during Constant Strain Rate Deformation of a Poly(methyl methacrylate) Glass

Investigation of the Nanoscale Elastic Recovery of A Polymer Using an Atomic Force Microscopy-Based Method

Multi-cycling Nanoindentation Study on Thin Optical Coatings on Glass

Uniaxial and biaxial experimental investigation of glassy polymers

Steady-State Serrated Deformation of Metallic Glass During Indentation

Lateral‐pushing induced surface lift‐up during nanoindentation of silicate glass

A Simple Model for the Deformation-Induced Relaxation of Glassy Polymers

Quantification of degradation of nanomechanical properties around a static damage

Relationship Between the Ratio of Young’s Modulus to Hardness and the Elastic Recovery of Nanoindentation

Discrete Dislocation Dynamics Simulations of Nanoindentation with Pre-stress: Hardness and Statistics of Abrupt Plastic Events

Mechanical characterization of soft viscoelastic gels via indentation and optimization-based inverse finite element analysis