Abstract:Unit tests play a key role in ensuring the correctness of software. However, manually creating unit tests is a laborious task, motivating the need for automation. Large Language Models (LLMs) have recently been applied to various aspects of software development, including their suggested use for automated generation of unit tests, but while requiring additional training or few-shot learning on examples of existing tests. This paper presents a large-scale empirical evaluation on the effectiveness of LLMs for automated unit test generation without requiring additional training or manual effort. Concretely, we consider an approach where the LLM is provided with prompts that include the signature and implementation of a function under test, along with usage examples extracted from documentation. Furthermore, if a generated test fails, our approach attempts to generate a new test that fixes the problem by re-prompting the model with the failing test and error message. We implement our approach in <sc>TestPilot</sc>, an adaptive LLM-based test generation tool for JavaScript that automatically generates unit tests for the methods in a given project's API. We evaluate <sc>TestPilot</sc> using OpenAI's <italic>gpt3.5-turbo</italic> LLM on 25 npm packages with a total of 1,684 API functions. The generated tests achieve a median statement coverage of 70.2% and branch coverage of 52.8%. In contrast, the state-of-the feedback-directed JavaScript test generation technique, Nessie, achieves only 51.3% statement coverage and 25.6% branch coverage. Furthermore, experiments with excluding parts of the information included in the prompts show that all components contribute towards the generation of effective test suites. We also find that 92.8% of <sc>TestPilot</sc>'s generated tests have <inline-formula><tex-math notation="LaTeX">$\leq$</tex-math><alternatives><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mo>≤</mml:mo></mml:math><inline-graphic xlink:href="schaefer-ieq1-3334955.gif"/></alternatives></inline-formula> 50% similarity with existing tests (as measured by normalized edit distance), with none of them being exact copies. Finally, we run <sc>TestPilot</sc> with two additional LLMs, OpenAI's older <italic>code-cushman-002</italic> LLM and <italic>StarCoder</italic>, an LLM for which the training process is publicly documented. Overall, we observed similar results with the former (68.2% median statement coverage), and somewhat worse results with the latter (54.0% median statement coverage), suggesting that the effectiveness of the approach is influenced by the size and training set of the LLM, but does not fundamentally depend on the specific model.

Using Large Language Models for Student-Code Guided Test Case Generation in Computer Science Education

Automating Autograding: Large Language Models as Test Suite Generators for Introductory Programming

Using Large Language Models to Generate JUnit Tests: An Empirical Study

A Tool for Test Case Scenarios Generation Using Large Language Models

Large Language Models as Test Case Generators: Performance Evaluation and Enhancement

Automatic Generation of Programming Exercises and Code Explanations using Large Language Models

Automated Control Logic Test Case Generation using Large Language Models

Automated User Story Generation with Test Case Specification Using Large Language Model

A System for Automated Unit Test Generation Using Large Language Models and Assessment of Generated Test Suites

An Empirical Evaluation of Using Large Language Models for Automated Unit Test Generation

Large Language Models in Computer Science Education: A Systematic Literature Review

Test-Driven Development for Code Generation

Automatically Generating CS Learning Materials with Large Language Models

Large-scale, Independent and Comprehensive study of the power of LLMs for test case generation

Comparing Code Explanations Created by Students and Large Language Models

TESTEVAL: Benchmarking Large Language Models for Test Case Generation

TestBench: Evaluating Class-Level Test Case Generation Capability of Large Language Models

Leveraging Large Language Models for Enhancing the Understandability of Generated Unit Tests

Examination of Code generated by Large Language Models

Automated Generation of Computer Graded Unit Testing-Based Programming Assessments for Education

CodeHelp: Using Large Language Models with Guardrails for Scalable Support in Programming Classes