Comparison of machine learning and statistical approaches for digital elevation model (DEM) correction: interim results

Chukwuma Okolie, Adedayo Adeleke, Julian Smit, Jon Mills, Iyke Maduako, Caleb Ogbeta
2024-02-09
Abstract:Several methods have been proposed for correcting the elevation bias in digital elevation models (DEMs) for example, linear regression. Nowadays, supervised machine learning enables the modelling of complex relationships between variables, and has been deployed by researchers in a variety of fields. In the existing literature, several studies have adopted either machine learning or statistical approaches in the task of DEM correction. However, to our knowledge, none of these studies have compared the performance of both approaches, especially with regard to open-access global DEMs. Our previous work has already shown the potential of machine learning approaches, specifically gradient boosted decision trees (GBDTs) for DEM correction. In this study, we share some results from the comparison of three recent implementations of gradient boosted decision trees (XGBoost, LightGBM and CatBoost), versus multiple linear regression (MLR) for enhancing the vertical accuracy of 30 m Copernicus and AW3D global DEMs in Cape Town, South Africa.
Machine Learning
What problem does this paper attempt to address?
The paper aims to address the issue of elevation bias in Digital Elevation Models (DEMs). Specifically, the researchers compared the performance of machine learning methods and statistical methods in correcting DEM errors, particularly in the application to open-access global DEM datasets. In the existing literature, although studies have employed either machine learning or statistical methods for DEM correction, few have directly compared the performance of these two approaches. This paper evaluates the effectiveness of three different implementations of Gradient Boosted Decision Trees (GBDTs), namely XGBoost, LightGBM, and CatBoost, against the method of Multiple Linear Regression (MLR) in improving the vertical accuracy of the Copernicus and AW3D global DEMs with a 30-meter resolution in the Cape Town area of South Africa. Through this comparison, the researchers aim to reveal which method is more effective under different terrain conditions.