Abstract:The purpose of this work is to better understand how the rate of phenotypic adaptation of cells in a tumor affects its ability to survive treatment. Drug resistance is an ongoing problem for maintaining a sustained response in treating advanced cancers. Regardless of their lineage, heritable phenotypic adaptions may be beneficial for the tumor to survive stepwise changes in the environment during tumor growth. There may be further benefit for cells to develop the trait of being adaptable - to respond to large shifts in the microenvironment, survive metastasis to a new organ, and thrive when treatments are applied. Genomic instability and phenotypic redundancy may aid in adaptations, but there may be limits. With too much mutation and deviation from the parental phenotype, cells lose important regulatory and maintenance functions necessary to survive. So is there an optimal rate of evolvability? We use an off-lattice agent-based model to investigate how the rate of change through phenotypic trait space affects tumor growth and response to treatment. We assign cells with different combinations of proliferation rates and migration speeds and test how the variance from the parental cell on division affects the selection of trait combinations over time. During growth, heterogeneity is gained quickly and space matters less if evolvability is forced to continually increase, but there is more selection for proliferative phenotypes and slower evolvability if its rate is allowed to drift freely. We found that tradeoffs generally imposed a greater selection force leading to faster recurrence and the coexistence of proliferation or migration specialists. We compared responses to continuous, intermittent, and adaptive treatment schedules of an anti-proliferative drug. At some point with treatment, there is an optimal evolvability, as larger increases in diversity allows for cells to fall back into a sensitive state and be killed by treatment. We aim to design better treatment strategies that work for tumors with different levels of evolvability by understanding how the rate of tumor evolution affects growth and treatment response. Citation Format: Jill A. Gallaher, Maximilian Strobl, Jeffrey West, Mark Roberston-Tessi, Alexander R. A. Anderson. Evolution of evolvability [abstract]. In: Proceedings of the AACR Special Conference in Cancer Research: Translating Cancer Evolution and Data Science: The Next Frontier; 2023 Dec 3-6; Boston, Massachusetts. Philadelphia (PA): AACR; Cancer Res 2024;84(3 Suppl_2) nr PR006.

A glance at evolvability: a theoretical analysis of its role in the evolutionary dynamics of cell populations

Abstract PR006: Evolution of evolvability

Increasing Evolvability Considered as a Large-Scale Trend in Evolution

Evolution takes multiple paths to evolvability when facing environmental change

Identifying high power breakdowns in accelerating structures with acoustic sensors

A comparative study between discrete and continuum models for the evolution of competing phenotype-structured cell populations in dynamical environments

A dynamical limit to evolutionary adaptation

Experimental evolution of evolvability

Resolving the paradox of evolvability with learning theory: How evolution learns to improve evolvability on rugged fitness landscapes

Evolution into chaos – implications of the trade-off between transmissibility and immune evasion

Evolution enhances mutational robustness and suppresses the emergence of a new phenotype: A new computational approach for studying evolution

The Role of Pleiotropy and Epistasis on Evolvability and Robustness in a Two-Peak Fitness Landscape

Comparative study between discrete and continuum models for the evolution of competing phenotype-structured cell populations in dynamical environments

Reliability of genetic networks is evolvable

Global Relationships in Fluctuation and Response in Adaptive Evolution

Biophysical constraints determine the selection of phenotypic fluctuations during directed evolution

Unifying (simple) models of genetic robustness and evolvability

Evolvability predicts macroevolution under fluctuating selection

Evolutionary dynamics of competing phenotype-structured populations in periodically fluctuating environments

Environmental Stability and Its Importance for the Emergence of Darwinian Evolution

Non-genetic variability: survival strategy or nuisance?