Downside Risk Reduction Using Regime-Switching Signals: A Statistical Jump Model Approach

Yizhan Shu,Chenyu Yu,John M. Mulvey

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1057/s41260-024-00376-x

2024-09-17

Abstract:This article investigates a regime-switching investment strategy aimed at mitigating downside risk by reducing market exposure during anticipated unfavorable market regimes. We highlight the statistical jump model (JM) for market regime identification, a recently developed robust model that distinguishes itself from traditional Markov-switching models by enhancing regime persistence through a jump penalty applied at each state transition. Our JM utilizes a feature set comprising risk and return measures derived solely from the return series, with the optimal jump penalty selected through a time-series cross-validation method that directly optimizes strategy performance. Our empirical analysis evaluates the realistic out-of-sample performance of various strategies on major equity indices from the US, Germany, and Japan from 1990 to 2023, in the presence of transaction costs and trading delays. The results demonstrate the consistent outperformance of the JM-guided strategy in reducing risk metrics such as volatility and maximum drawdown, and enhancing risk-adjusted returns like the Sharpe ratio, when compared to both hidden Markov model-guided strategy and the buy-and-hold strategy. These findings underline the enhanced persistence, practicality, and versatility of strategies utilizing JMs for regime-switching signals.

Portfolio Management,Statistical Finance

What problem does this paper attempt to address?

The core problem that this paper attempts to solve is **how to reduce the downside risk of the portfolio through market - state - switching signals based on the Statistical Jump Model (JM)**. Specifically, the paper explores a simple 0/1 investment strategy, that is, making a complete switch between risky assets and risk - free assets according to the predicted market state (bull market or bear market) to reduce potential losses under unfavorable market conditions.

### Main problem decomposition:
1. **Challenges in identifying market states**:
- Although traditional Hidden Markov Models (HMMs) have been proven to be able to effectively capture the dynamic changes of market states, the following problems may exist in practical applications:
- Sensitive to incorrect model parameter estimation or inaccurate model settings.
- In high - frequency data, due to high state persistence, HMMs may generate too many false signals.
- The paper proposes using Statistical Jump Models (JMs) as an alternative to enhance the stability and accuracy of state - switching signals.

2. **Downside - risk management**:
- Downside risk refers to the losses that may occur under unfavorable market conditions. The paper aims to reduce risk indicators such as volatility and maximum drawdown by using a simple 0/1 strategy, that is, completely transferring funds to risk - free assets when a bear market is predicted.
- The paper evaluates the performance of different models (including HMMs and JMs) under real - market conditions, including the impact of trading costs and trading delays.

3. **Model selection and optimization**:
- How to select the optimal jump penalty parameter to balance the accuracy and delay of the model?
- The paper proposes a time - series cross - validation method to directly optimize the Sharpe Ratio of the strategy in order to select the best jump penalty parameter.

4. **Empirical analysis**:
- The paper conducts an empirical study on the major stock indices in the United States, Germany, and Japan (S&P 500, DAX, Nikkei 225) from 1990 to 2023 and compares the out - of - sample performance of different strategies.
- The results show that the JM - based strategy performs better in reducing volatility and maximum drawdown and significantly improves the risk - adjusted return.

### Formula explanation:
The core formula involved in the paper is the optimization problem of the Statistical Jump Model:
\[
\min_{\Theta,S} \sum_{t = 0}^{T - 1}l(x_t,\theta_{s_t})+\lambda\sum_{t = 1}^{T - 1}1\{s_{t - 1}\neq s_t\}.
\]
- **Variable explanation**:
- \(x_t\): The feature vector on the \(t\)-th day (obtained by normalizing the return series).
- \(\theta_{s_t}\): The model parameter (center point) corresponding to the \(s_t\)-th state.
- \(l(x_t,\theta_{s_t})\): The loss function, which measures the difference between the feature vector \(x_t\) and the model parameter \(\theta_{s_t}\).
- \(\lambda\): The jump penalty parameter, which controls the frequency of state switching.
- \(1\{s_{t - 1}\neq s_t\}\): The indicator function, which takes the value of 1 if the states on the \((t - 1)\)-th day and the \(t\)-th day are different, and 0 otherwise.

Through this optimization problem, JMs can maintain the persistence of the state sequence while avoiding overly frequent state switching.

### Summary:
The core objective of the paper is to design an effective investment strategy through an improved market - state - identification model (such as JMs) to reduce downside risk and improve risk - adjusted returns. Research shows that, compared with traditional HMMs and buy - and - hold strategies, the JM - based strategy shows stronger robustness and higher profit potential under various market conditions.