Abstract:The $\Lambda$CDM model faces several tensions with recent cosmological data and their increased accuracy. The mismatch between the values of the Hubble constant $H_0$ obtained from direct distance ladder measurements and from the cosmic microwave background (CMB) is the most statistically significant, but the amplitude of the matter fluctuations is also regarded as a serious concern, leading to the investigation of a plethora of models. We first show that the combination of several recent measurements from local probes leads to a tight constraint on the present-day matter density $\Omega_M$ as well as on the amplitude of the matter fluctuations, both acceptably consistent with the values inferred from the CMB. Secondly, we show that the data on cosmic chronometers allow to derive an accurate value of the Hubble constant $H_0$ for $\Lambda$CDM models: $H_0 = 67.4 \pm 1.34$ km/s/Mpc. This implies that, within $\Lambda$CDM, some determinations of $H_0$ are biased. Considering a bias on the Hubble constant as a nuisance parameter within $\Lambda$CDM, we examine such a $\Lambda$CDM$+ H_0$ bias model on the same statistical grounds as alternative cosmological models. We show that the former statistically supersede most existing extended models proposed up to now. In a third step, we show that the value of $\Omega_M$ we obtained, combined with $H_0$ from SH0ES, leads to an accurate measurement of $\omega_M$, providing an additional low-redshift test for cosmological models. From this test, most extensions seem to be confronted with a new tension, whereas the $\Lambda$CDM with $H_0 \sim 67 $ has none. We conclude that a standard $\Lambda$CDM model with an unknown bias in the Cepheids distance calibration represents a model that reaches a remarkable agreement, statistically better than previously proposed extensions with $H_0 \sim 73 $ for which such a comparison can be performed. (abridged)

$Λ$CDM Tensions: Localising Missing Physics through Consistency Checks

Extensions to $Λ$CDM at Intermediate Redshifts to Solve the Tensions ?

Tensions in cosmology: a discussion of statistical tools to determine inconsistencies

$Λ_{\rm s}$CDM model: A promising scenario for alleviation of cosmological tensions

Hints of a physical origin for the S 8 tension

On dataset tensions and signatures of new cosmological physics

Relaxing cosmological tensions with a sign switching cosmological constant: Improved results with Planck, BAO, and Pantheon data

$Λ$CDM is alive and well

Cosmographic view on the $H_0$ and $σ_8$ tensions

A proposal to improve the accuracy of cosmological observables and address the Hubble tension problem

On the consistency of $Λ$CDM with CMB measurements in light of the latest Planck, ACT, and SPT data

Cosmological constraints on $Λ_{\rm s}$CDM scenario in a type II minimally modified gravity

$Λ_{\rm s}$CDM cosmology: Alleviating major cosmological tensions by predicting standard neutrino properties

How robust are the parameter constraints extending the $Λ$CDM model?

Hubble Tension: The Evidence of New Physics

Seven hints that early-time new physics alone is not sufficient to solve the Hubble tension

No-go guide for the Hubble tension: late-time or local-scale new physics

Investigating the Hubble Tension and $σ_8$ Discrepancy in f(Q) Cosmology

On the implications of the `cosmic calibration tension' beyond $H_0$ and the synergy between early- and late-time new physics