Abstract:Countries pledge GHG mitigation goals in form of near-term emissions targets for 2030, long-term net-zero emissions in mid-century (some countries) and targets for methane emission reductions, towards limiting global warming as stipulated in the Paris Agreement. These undergo regular revisions to strengthen the ambition, with the latest set of revisions occurring during COP26 and COP27. As of December 2022, 169 countries have near-term targets, 56 have long-term targets to become carbon neutral and 150 nations have pledged to reduce their methane emissions up to 30% by 2030. The end-of-century temperature rise is highly sensitive to the pledges but also to actual extent of implementation of these pledges. Using historical emissions from the PRIMAP-Hist dataset, future emissions of CO2, N2O and CH4 are modelled for each country by incorporating their respective near-term, long-term and methane pledges. Emissions for other climate forcers are assumed to follow SSP4-60. These emission profiles are used as input to simple climate model – ACC2 (Tanaka et al., 2021) to estimate the temperature impacts. With the current pledges, the global temperature rise in 2100 is expected to be 2.0 and 2.1 °C, corresponding to the fulfillment of conditional and unconditional near-term pledges, respectively. We further explore a suite of emissions pathways to identify some key ‘levers’ across the pledges that can strongly influence the projected global temperature in 2100. We found that these levers can further reduce the temperature by 0.50 °C or increase by 0.25 °C. The most significant reductions in temperature rise can be achieved by ratcheting up of the current conditional targets by 10%, shifting the net-zero target year to 2050 for all countries currently having a longer-term goal and adding a net-zero target in 2070 for countries with currently no long-term goals. Inclusion of all these levers can increase the likelihood of limiting temperature rise well below 2 °C and bringing it closer to 1.5 °C. Additional, relatively smaller, contributions accrue from inclusion of Russia, China and India in the Global Methane Pledge. On the other hand, failing to meet even the unconditional NDC targets and delaying the current net-zero targets by 10 years contribute to increases in temperature rise of 0.08 and 0.17 °C. Contributions are also evaluated on a country-by-country basis.ReferenceTanaka K, Boucher O, Ciais P, Johansson DJA, Morfeldt J (2021) Cost-effective implementation of the Paris Agreement using flexible greenhouse gas metrics. Science Advances 7 (22):eabf9020. doi:10.1126/sciadv.abf902

Aligning long-term climate mitigation with enhanced methane action

The methane imperative

Global methane pledge versus carbon dioxide emission reduction

Methane mitigation: methods to reduce emissions, on the path to the Paris Agreement

Levers of climate pledges influencing the Paris Agreement target

National Strategies for Addressing Climate Change Via Methane Emissions

Toward a Versatile Spaceborne Architecture for Immediate Monitoring of the Global Methane Pledge

Erratum To: Implication of Paris Agreement in the Context of Long-Term Climate Mitigation Goals

A Strong Mitigation Scenario Maintains Climate Neutrality of Northern Peatlands

How much methane removal is required to avoid overshooting 1.5°C?

Implications of Near-Term Mitigation on China's Long-Term Energy Transitions for Aligning with the Paris Goals

Effect of Methane Mitigation on Global Temperature under a Permafrost Feedback

Short- and long-term warming effects of methane may affect the cost-effectiveness of mitigation policies and benefits of low-meat diets

Exploring Fair and Ambitious Mitigation Contributions under the Paris Agreement Goals

Atmospheric Carbon Dioxide Removal: Long-Term Consequences and Commitment

Is methane the 'climate culprit'? Fixing the 'Broken Record' while unmasking the dangers of using imprecise, long-term GWP for methane to address the climate emergency

Long-term reduction potential of non-CO2 greenhouse gases

Challenges and Opportunities in the Global Methane Cycle

Enhanced Atmospheric Oxidation Toward Carbon Neutrality Reduces Methane’s Climate Forcing

A Comparative Review of Methane Policies of the United States and China in the Context of US – China Climate Cooperation

The Contribution of Non-CO2 Greenhouse Gas Mitigation to Achieving Long-Term Temperature Goals