Advancing Legal Reasoning: The Integration of AI to Navigate Complexities and Biases in Global Jurisprudence with Semi-Automated Arbitration Processes (SAAPs)

Michael De'Shazer

2024-03-01

Abstract:This study consists of a novel approach toward the analysis of court judgments spanning five countries, including the United States, the United Kingdom, Rwanda, Sweden and Hong Kong. This study also explores the intersection of the latest advancements in artificial intelligence (AI) and legal analysis, emphasizing the role of AI (specifically generative AI) in identifying human biases and facilitating automated, valid, and coherent multisided argumentation of court judgments with the goal of ensuring consistent application of laws in and across various jurisdictions. By incorporating Advanced Language Models (ALMs) and a newly introduced human-AI collaborative framework, this paper seeks to analyze Grounded Theory-based research design with Advanced Language Models (ALMs) in the practice of law. SHIRLEY is the name of the AI-based application (built on top of OpenAI's GPT technology), focusing on detecting logical inconsistencies and biases across various legal decisions. SHIRLEY analysis is aggregated and is accompanied by a comparison-oriented AI-based application called SAM (also an ALM) to identify relative deviations in SHIRLEY bias detections. Further, a CRITIC is generated within semi-autonomous arbitration process via the ALM, SARA. A novel approach is introduced in the utilization of an AI arbitrator to critically evaluate biases and qualitative-in-nature nuances identified by the aforementioned AI applications (SAM in concert with SHIRLEY), based on the Hague Rules on Business and Human Rights Arbitration. This Semi-Automated Arbitration Process (SAAP) aims to uphold the integrity and fairness of legal judgments by ensuring a nuanced debate-resultant "understanding" through a hybrid system of AI and human-based collaborative analysis.

Computers and Society,Human-Computer Interaction

What problem does this paper attempt to address?

The problem this paper attempts to address is the identification and correction of complexities and biases in global judicial systems through advanced artificial intelligence (AI) technologies. Specifically, the authors utilize advanced language models (ALMs) and a newly introduced human-machine collaboration framework to analyze logical inconsistencies and human biases in legal judgments. The application developed in the paper, SHIRLEY, is based on OpenAI's GPT technology and is used to detect biases in different legal judgments. It is compared with another application named SAM to identify relative biases detected by SHIRLEY.

Additionally, the paper introduces a semi-automated arbitration process (SAAP) aimed at evaluating and correcting these biases and qualitative nuances through an AI arbitrator (SARA). This approach aims to ensure consistency and fairness in legal judgments by combining AI and human collaborative analysis. The research covers court judgments from 5 countries: the United States, the United Kingdom, Rwanda, Sweden, and Hong Kong, aiming to explore the application of AI in legal analysis and propose a new quantitative method for classifying and measuring content based on human researchers' instructions.

In summary, the core objective of this paper is to improve the quality and fairness of legal judgments through AI technology, particularly when addressing consistency issues across different judicial jurisdictions.