Random features models: a way to study the success of naive imputation

Alexis Ayme,Claire Boyer,Aymeric Dieuleveut,Erwan Scornet
2024-02-06
Abstract:Constant (naive) imputation is still widely used in practice as this is a first easy-to-use technique to deal with missing data. Yet, this simple method could be expected to induce a large bias for prediction purposes, as the imputed input may strongly differ from the true underlying data. However, recent works suggest that this bias is low in the context of high-dimensional linear predictors when data is supposed to be missing completely at random (MCAR). This paper completes the picture for linear predictors by confirming the intuition that the bias is negligible and that surprisingly naive imputation also remains relevant in very low
Statistics Theory,Machine Learning
What problem does this paper attempt to address?