Abstract:The second-order properties of the training loss have a massive impact on the optimization dynamics of deep learning models. Fort & Scherlis (2019) discovered that a large excess of positive curvature and local convexity of the loss Hessian is associated with highly trainable initial points located in a region coined the "Goldilocks zone". Only a handful of subsequent studies touched upon this relationship, so it remains largely unexplained. In this paper, we present a rigorous and comprehensive analysis of the Goldilocks zone for homogeneous neural networks. In particular, we derive the fundamental condition resulting in excess of positive curvature of the loss, explaining and refining its conventionally accepted connection to the initialization norm. Further, we relate the excess of positive curvature to model confidence, low initial loss, and a previously unknown type of vanishing cross-entropy loss gradient. To understand the importance of excessive positive curvature for trainability of deep networks, we optimize fully-connected and convolutional architectures outside the Goldilocks zone and analyze the emergent behaviors. We find that strong model performance is not perfectly aligned with the Goldilocks zone, calling for further research into this relationship.

What problem does this paper attempt to address?

The problem that this paper attempts to solve is about the nature of the "Goldilocks zone" in neural network initialization and its relationship with model training performance. Specifically: 1. **Definition and Background**: - The paper first reviews the "Goldilocks zone" discovered by Fort & Scherlis (2019), which is a region in the neural network optimization space with an unusually high positive curvature and local convexity. This region is considered to contain many initial points suitable for training. - However, current research is insufficient regarding why these initial points are particularly suitable for training and their relationship with initialization parameters. 2. **Research Objectives**: - **Refine the Definition of the "Goldilocks zone"**: The paper aims to re - define and interpret the "Goldilocks zone" through rigorous analysis. The author finds that this region cannot be simply characterized by the norm of initialization parameters but is determined by more fundamental conditions. - **Explore the Relationship between Positive Curvature and Model Performance**: The paper explores how the excess of positive curvature affects the model's training performance. The author analyzes the behavior of fully - connected and convolutional networks with different initialization norms inside and outside the "Goldilocks zone" by optimizing them. - **Reveal New Phenomena**: The paper discovers that certain initializations within the "Goldilocks zone" can lead to degenerative learning behaviors, such as an increase in zero logits, which has not been reported in previous studies. 3. **Main Contributions**: - **Theoretical Analysis**: From the perspective of Gauss - Newton decomposition, the paper derives the basic conditions that lead to an excess of positive curvature and explains the reasons for the disappearance of the excess of positive curvature (saturated softmax and vanishing logit gradients). - **Experimental Verification**: Through extensive experiments, the paper verifies the theoretical analysis and shows the relationship between the excess of positive curvature and model confidence, initial loss, and cross - entropy gradient norm. - **Discovery of New Phenomena**: The paper reports that some initializations within the "Goldilocks zone" can lead to degenerative learning behaviors, which provides a new perspective for understanding the impact of initialization on training performance. 4. **Conclusion**: - The conclusion of the paper is that the "Goldilocks zone" is not a simple region characterized by the norm of initialization parameters but is determined by more complex conditions. Although the excess of positive curvature is related to the model's training performance, it is not a perfect predictor. This finding provides a new direction for future in - depth research. Through these studies, the paper provides a new theoretical basis and experimental evidence for understanding the impact of neural network initialization on training performance.

Deconstructing the Goldilocks Zone of Neural Network Initialization

How to Initialize your Network? Robust Initialization for WeightNorm & ResNets

Emergent properties of the local geometry of neural loss landscapes

Towards Understanding the Condensation of Two-layer Neural Networks at Initial Training.

Can Stability be Detrimental? Better Generalization through Gradient Descent Instabilities

On the Effect of Initialization: The Scaling Path of 2-Layer Neural Networks

On the Omnipresence of Spurious Local Minima in Certain Neural Network Training Problems

On the Unstable Convergence Regime of Gradient Descent

Empirical Analysis of the Hessian of Over-Parametrized Neural Networks

A Type of Generalization Error Induced by Initialization in Deep Neural Networks.

The Multiscale Structure of Neural Network Loss Functions: The Effect on Optimization and Origin

The Convex Landscape of Neural Networks: Characterizing Global Optima and Stationary Points via Lasso Models

Good regularity creates large learning rate implicit biases: edge of stability, balancing, and catapult

Curvature in the Looking-Glass: Optimal Methods to Exploit Curvature of Expectation in the Loss Landscape

Provable Benefit of Orthogonal Initialization in Optimizing Deep Linear Networks

On Symmetry and Initialization for Neural Networks

Understanding the Initial Condensation of Convolutional Neural Networks

Why Learning of Large-Scale Neural Networks Behaves Like Convex Optimization

Complex fractal trainability boundary can arise from trivial non-convexity

Experimental Exploration on Loss Surface of Deep Neural Network

Early Stage Convergence and Global Convergence of Training Mildly Parameterized Neural Networks