Abstract:Ranking algorithms are deployed widely to order a set of items in applications such as search engines, news feeds, and recommendation systems. Recent studies, however, have shown that, left unchecked, the output of ranking algorithms can result in decreased diversity in the type of content presented, promote stereotypes, and polarize opinions. In order to address such issues, we study the following variant of the traditional ranking problem when, in addition, there are fairness or diversity constraints. Given a collection of items along with 1) the value of placing an item in a particular position in the ranking, 2) the collection of sensitive attributes (such as gender, race, political opinion) of each item and 3) a collection of constraints that, for each k, bound the number of items with each attribute that are allowed to appear in the top k positions of the ranking, the goal is to output a ranking that maximizes the value with respect to the original rank quality metric while respecting the constraints. This problem encapsulates various well-studied problems related to bipartite and hypergraph matching as special cases and turns out to be hard to approximate even with simple constraints. Our main technical contributions are fast exact and approximation algorithms along with complementary hardness results that, together, come close to settling the approximability of this constrained ranking maximization problem. Unlike prior work on the constrained matching problems, our algorithm runs in linear time, even when the number of constraints is large, its approximation ratio does not depend on the number of constraints, and it produces solutions with small constraint violations. Our results rely on insights about the constrained matching problem when the objective satisfies properties that appear in common ranking metrics such as Discounted Cumulative Gain, Spearman's rho or Bradley-Terry.

Fair Active Ranking from Pairwise Preferences

Fair Pairs: Fairness-Aware Ranking Recovery from Pairwise Comparisons

Approximate Ranking from Pairwise Comparisons

Pareto Pairwise Ranking for Fairness Enhancement of Recommender Systems

Inductive Pairwise Ranking: Going Beyond the n log(n) Barrier

Ranking with Fairness Constraints

Preference Completion: Large-scale Collaborative Ranking from Pairwise Comparisons

Rate-Optimal Rank Aggregation with Private Pairwise Rankings

Pairwise Learning for Personalized Ranking with Noisy Comparisons

Multiple Pairwise Ranking with Implicit Feedback.

Active Preference Learning for Ordering Items In- and Out-of-sample

Bias-aware ranking from pairwise comparisons

Best-item Learning in Random Utility Models with Subset Choices

Towards Efficient Pareto-optimal Utility-Fairness between Groups in Repeated Rankings

Fair Learning-to-Rank from Implicit Feedback

Fairness in Recommendation Ranking through Pairwise Comparisons

Optimizing Group-Fair Plackett-Luce Ranking Models for Relevance and Ex-Post Fairness

Fair Rank Aggregation

Fairness in Ranking under Disparate Uncertainty

Two-sided fairness in rankings via Lorenz dominance