Abstract:We explore strategies aimed at reducing the amount of computation, both quantum and classical, required to run the Quantum Approximate Optimization Algorithm (QAOA). First, following Wurtz et al. [<a class="link-external link-http" href="http://Phys.Rev" rel="external noopener nofollow">this http URL</a> A 104:052419], we consider the standard QAOA with instance-independent "tree" parameters chosen in advance. These tree parameters are chosen to optimize the MaxCut expectation for large girth graphs. We provide extensive numerical evidence supporting the performance guarantee for tree parameters conjectured in [<a class="link-external link-http" href="http://Phys.Rev" rel="external noopener nofollow">this http URL</a> A 103:042612] and see that the approximation ratios obtained with tree parameters are typically well beyond the conjectured lower bounds, often comparable to performing a full optimization. This suggests that in practice, the QAOA can achieve near-optimal performance without the need for parameter optimization. Next, we modify the warm-start QAOA of Tate et al. [Quantum 7:1121]. The starting state for the QAOA is now an optimized product state associated with a solution of the Goemans-Williamson (GW) algorithm. Surprisingly, the tree parameters continue to perform well for the warm-start QAOA. We find that for random 3-regular graphs with hundreds of vertices, the expected cut obtained by the warm-start QAOA at depth $p \gtrsim 3$ is comparable to that of the standard GW algorithm. Our numerics on random instances do not provide general performance guarantees but do provide substantial evidence that there exists a regime of instance sizes in which the QAOA finds good solutions at low depth without the need for parameter optimization. For each instance studied, we classically compute the expected size of the QAOA distribution of cuts; producing the actual cuts requires running on a quantum computer.

Grover-QAOA for 3-SAT: Quadratic Speedup, Fair-Sampling, and Parameter Clustering

Grover-QAOA for 3-SAT: Quadratic Speedup, Fair-Sampling, and Parameter Clustering

Solving boolean satisfiability problems with the quantum approximate optimization algorithm

Quantum Approximate Optimisation for Not-All-Equal SAT

Amplitude amplification-inspired QAOA: Improving the success probability for solving 3SAT

Solution of SAT Problems with the Adaptive-Bias Quantum Approximate Optimization Algorithm

High-Round QAOA for MAX $k$-SAT on Trapped Ion NISQ Devices

Quantum speedups in solving near-symmetric optimization problems by low-depth QAOA

Strategies for running the QAOA at hundreds of qubits

Numerical Evidence for Exponential Speed-up of QAOA over Unstructured Search for Approximate Constrained Optimization

HyQSAT: A Hybrid Approach for 3-SAT Problems by Integrating Quantum Annealer with CDCL.

The Quantum Alternating Operator Ansatz for Satisfiability Problems

Efficient Digital Quadratic Unconstrained Binary Optimization Solvers for SAT Problems

An adaptive quantum approximate optimization algorithm for solving combinatorial problems on a quantum computer

Sampling Frequency Thresholds for Quantum Advantage of Quantum Approximate Optimization Algorithm

The QAOA with Few Measurements

Biased Degenerate Ground-State Sampling of Small Ising Models with Converged QAOA

Evidence of Scaling Advantage for the Quantum Approximate Optimization Algorithm on a Classically Intractable Problem

Limitations of Quantum Approximate Optimization in Solving Generic Higher-Order Constraint-Satisfaction Problems

Evaluating Quantum Approximate Optimization Algorithm: A Case Study