Haolan Zhan,Yufei Wang,Tao Feng,Yuncheng Hua,Suraj Sharma,Zhuang Li,Lizhen Qu,Zhaleh Semnani Azad,Ingrid Zukerman,Gholamreza Haffari
Abstract:Negotiation is a crucial ability in human communication. Recently, there has been a resurgent research interest in negotiation dialogue systems, whose goal is to create intelligent agents that can assist people in resolving conflicts or reaching agreements. Although there have been many explorations into negotiation dialogue systems, a systematic review of this task has not been performed to date. We aim to fill this gap by investigating recent studies in the field of negotiation dialogue systems, and covering benchmarks, evaluations and methodologies within the literature. We also discuss potential future directions, including multi-modal, multi-party and cross-cultural negotiation scenarios. Our goal is to provide the community with a systematic overview of negotiation dialogue systems and to inspire future research.
What problem does this paper attempt to address?
The problem that this paper attempts to solve is: **Lack of a systematic review of Negotiation Dialogue Systems**. Although there have been many explorations on negotiation dialogue systems, there has not yet been a comprehensive review to summarize the progress, benchmark tests, evaluation methods and modeling techniques in this field.
Specifically, the paper aims to:
1. **Point out the limitations of humans in negotiations and systematically summarize the existing AI solutions** to help overcome these limitations.
2. **Systematically classify the current negotiation dialogue benchmarks from the perspectives of distribution and integration**, and provide an overview of evaluation methods.
3. **Point out the limitations of current research and propose promising research directions in the future**, including multi - modal, multi - party and cross - cultural negotiation scenarios.
### Core issues of the paper
- **Limitations of humans in negotiations**: Humans are easily influenced by various biases, may be swayed by emotions during the negotiation process, ignore useful implicit information provided by other participants, and lack the necessary skills, training and knowledge to achieve their goals.
- **Lack of systematic review**: Although there is a lot of research on negotiation dialogue systems, there is not yet a comprehensive review to summarize the progress, benchmark tests, evaluation methods and modeling techniques in this field.
### Solutions
The paper solves the above problems in the following ways:
1. **Systematically summarize existing research**: Systematically summarize existing research from multiple dimensions such as data sets, evaluation indicators and modeling methods.
2. **Propose future research directions**: Discuss future research directions, such as multi - modal, multi - party and cross - cultural negotiation scenarios, providing guidance for subsequent research.
### Specific content
The paper is divided into the following parts:
- **Introduction**: Introduce the importance of negotiation and its applications in real - life, and point out the limitations of humans in negotiations.
- **Negotiation from the perspective of social science research**: Introduce the framework of human negotiation and the limitations of humans in negotiation, and explain why it is necessary to develop powerful negotiation dialogue systems.
- **Methodology overview**: Detail the modeling methods of negotiation dialogue systems, including strategy modeling, negotiator modeling and action learning.
- **Negotiation data sets**: Summarize the existing negotiation data sets and classify them according to negotiation types (integrative and distributive).
- **Evaluation methods**: Divide evaluation methods into three categories: goal - oriented evaluation, game - based evaluation and manual evaluation, and summarize various evaluation indicators.
Through these contents, the paper not only fills the gap in the systematic review of the negotiation dialogue system field, but also provides valuable references and guidance for future research.