Abstract:Parametric strong lensing studies of galaxy clusters often display misleading features: group/cluster scale dark matter components without any stellar counterpart, offsets between both components larger than what might be allowed by neither Cold Dark Matter nor self interacting Dark Matter models, or significant unexplained external shear components. I am revisiting mass models where such misleading (and interesting) features have been reported, adopting the following working hypothesis: any group or cluster scale dark matter clump introduced in the modelling should be associated with a luminous counterpart, and any well motivated and reliable prior should be considered, even when this degrades the fit. The goal is to derive a physically motivated description of the dark matter component which might be compared to theoretical expectations. I succeed doing so in galaxy clusters AS 1063, MACS J0416 and MACS J1206, finding that the shape of the inner dark matter component has a flat density profile. These findings may be useful for the interpretation within dark matter scenario, such as self-interacting dark matter. I fail in Abell 370: a three dark matter clumps mass model (each clump being associated with its stellar counterpart) is unable to reproduce the observational constraints with a precision smaller than 2.3 arcsec. In order to provide a sub arcsec precision, I need to describe the dark matter distribution using a four dark matter clumps model, as found in earlier works. Examining the total projected mass maps, I however find a good agreement between the total mass and the stellar distribution in Abell 370, both being, to first order, bimodal. I interpret the misleading features as being symptomatic of the lack of realism of a parametric description of the dark matter distribution. I encourage caution and criticism on the outputs of parametric strong lensing modelling.

Exploiting Machine Learning and Disequilibrium in Galaxy Clusters to Obtain a Mass Profile

Exploiting Machine Learning and Disequilibrium in Galaxy Clusters to Obtain a Mass Profile

Galaxy cluster profiles: A Gaussian mixture model approach to halo miscentering

A Machine Learning Method to Infer Clusters of Galaxies Mass Radial Profiles from Mock Sunyaev-Zel’dovich Maps with the Three Hundred Clusters

Semi-Analytic Model Predictions of Mass Segregation from Groups to Clusters

YZiCS: on the Mass Segregation of Galaxies in Clusters

The galaxy-galaxy strong lensing cross section and the internal distribution of matter in ΛCDM substructure

The Dark Matter Distribution in the Central Regions of Galaxy Clusters: Implications for CDM

Mass & Light in Galaxy Clusters: The case of Abell 370

Spatial Distribution of Intracluster Light versus Dark Matter in Horizon Run 5

Measuring the Mass Distribution in Galaxy Clusters

Mass scaling relations for dark halos from an analytic universal outer density profile

The SLUGGS Survey: Breaking degeneracies between dark matter, anisotropy and the IMF using globular cluster subpopulations in the giant elliptical NGC 5846

Galaxy Kinematics and Mass Calibration in Massive SZE Selected Galaxy Clusters to z=1.3

Modelling Galaxy Clustering in a High-Resolution Simulation of Structure Formation

Unveiling the shape: a multi-wavelength analysis of the galaxy clusters Abell 76 and Abell 1307

Prospects for Determining the Mass Distributions of Galaxy Clusters on Large Scales Using Weak Gravitational Lensing

Luminous and Dark Matter Profiles from Galaxies to Clusters: Bridging the Gap with Group-scale Lenses

Mass & Light in Galaxy Clusters: Parametric Strong Lensing Approach