Education Policy and Intergenerational Educational Persistence: Evidence from rural Benin

Christelle Zozoungbo

2024-01-31

Abstract:This paper employs a nonlinear difference-in-differences approach to empirically examine the Maximally Maintained Inequality (MMI) hypothesis in rural Benin. The findings of this study confirm the MMI hypothesis. In particular, it is observed that when 76% of educated parents choose to educate their daughters in the absence of educational programs, in contrast to only 37% among non-educated parents, the average impact of tuition fee subsidy on enrollment probability in primary schools stands at 3.8\% for non-educated households and 0.27% for educated households. Conversely, in cases where only 27% of educated parents decide to educate their daughters without education programs, the average effect of tuition fee waivers on enrollment probability in primary schools increases to 19.64\% for non-educated households and 24\% for educated households. From the analysis of household education decisions influenced by a preference for education and budget constraints, three key conclusions emerge to explain the mechanism behind the MMI. Firstly, when the income advantage of educated households compared to non-educated households is significantly high, irrespective of the level of their preference advantage, reducing the financial cost of education induces a greater shift in education decisions among non-educated households. Secondly, in situations where educated households do not possess an income advantage relative to non-educated households, the reduction in education-related financial costs leads to a more pronounced change in education decisions among educated households. Lastly, for the low-income advantage of educated households, as the income advantage of educated households increases, non-educated households respond more to education policy than educated parents, if the preference advantage of educated households is relatively smaller.

General Economics

What problem does this paper attempt to address?

The paper aims to explore how education policies in rural areas of Benin affect intergenerational educational persistence and to test the "Maximally Maintained Inequality (MMI)" hypothesis. Specifically, the paper evaluates the impact of the free primary education policy for girls implemented by the Benin government in 2003 using the Nonlinear Difference-in-Differences method. The study finds that, in the absence of an education plan, the proportion of educated parents choosing to educate their daughters is significantly higher than that of uneducated parents. However, after the implementation of the tuition subsidy policy, the increase in enrollment probability for uneducated families is significantly greater than that for educated families.

The paper mainly focuses on the following points:
1. **Policy Background**: In 2003, the Benin government began to waive tuition fees for primary school girls in rural areas and extended this policy nationwide in 2006.
2. **Data Source**: The study uses data from the 2013 Benin Population Census, covering information from approximately 180,000 households.
3. **Research Method**: The Nonlinear Difference-in-Differences method is used to compare changes in educational decisions across different family backgrounds.
4. **Main Conclusions**:
- In uneducated families, the tuition waiver has a greater impact on children's enrollment rates.
- Educated families have higher enrollment rates for their children even without economic incentives.
- The policy's effect is more significant for uneducated families than for educated families.

In summary, the paper empirically demonstrates the effectiveness of the tuition waiver policy in reducing educational inequality, particularly highlighting its more significant impact on uneducated families.