Evaluation in Neural Style Transfer: A Review

Eleftherios Ioannou,Steve Maddock

2024-01-30

Abstract:The field of Neural Style Transfer (NST) has witnessed remarkable progress in the past few years, with approaches being able to synthesize artistic and photorealistic images and videos of exceptional quality. To evaluate such results, a diverse landscape of evaluation methods and metrics is used, including authors' opinions based on side-by-side comparisons, human evaluation studies that quantify the subjective judgements of participants, and a multitude of quantitative computational metrics which objectively assess the different aspects of an algorithm's performance. However, there is no consensus regarding the most suitable and effective evaluation procedure that can guarantee the reliability of the results. In this review, we provide an in-depth analysis of existing evaluation techniques, identify the inconsistencies and limitations of current evaluation methods, and give recommendations for standardized evaluation practices. We believe that the development of a robust evaluation framework will not only enable more meaningful and fairer comparisons among NST methods but will also enhance the comprehension and interpretation of research findings in the field.

Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition,Machine Learning,Neural and Evolutionary Computing

What problem does this paper attempt to address?

The problem that this paper attempts to solve is the standardization and reliability of evaluation methods in the field of Neural Style Transfer (NST). Specifically, although NST technology has made remarkable progress in the past few years and can generate high - quality artistic and photo - realistic images and videos, the methods and metrics used in evaluating these results are very diverse and lack consensus. The paper points out that currently there is no recognized and effective evaluation procedure that can guarantee the reliability of the results. Therefore, this article aims to provide an in - depth analysis of existing evaluation techniques, identify the inconsistencies and limitations of current evaluation methods, and propose suggestions for standardizing evaluation practices. The author believes that establishing a robust evaluation framework can not only make the comparison between NST methods more meaningful and fair, but also enhance the understanding and interpretation of research results in this field.