Layer group classification of two-dimensional materials

Jingheng Fu,Mikael Kuisma,Ask Hjorth Larsen,Kohei Shinohara,Atsushi Togo,Kristian S. Thygesen

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1088/2053-1583/ad3e0c

2024-01-30

Abstract:The symmetry of a crystal structure with a three-dimensional (3D) lattice can be classified by one of the 230 space group types. For some types of crystals, e.g. crystalline films, surfaces, or planar interfaces, it is more appropriate to assume a 2D lattice. With this assumption, the structure can be classified by one of the 80 layer group types. We have implemented an algorithm to determine the layer group type of a 3D structure with a 2D lattice, and applied it to more than 15,000 monolayer structures in the Computational 2D Materials (C2DB) database. We compare the classification of monolayers by layer groups and space groups, respectively. The latter is defined as the space group of the 3D bulk structure obtained by repeating the monolayer periodically in the direction perpendicular to the 2D lattice (AA-stacking). By this correspondence, nine pairs of layer group types are mapped to the same space group type due to the inability of the space group to distinguish the in-plane and out-of-plane axes. In total 18% of the monolayers in the C2DB belong to one of these layer group pairs and are thus not properly classified by the space group type.

Materials Science

What problem does this paper attempt to address?

The paper attempts to address the problem of accurately determining the layer group type in two-dimensional (2D) materials. Specifically: 1. **Algorithm Implementation**: The paper proposes a new numerical algorithm to determine the layer group type of three-dimensional crystal structures with a two-dimensional lattice and implements this algorithm in the open-source symmetry analysis library Spglib. 2. **Database Application**: The algorithm is applied to calculate the layer group types of over 15,000 monolayer structures in the 2D materials database (C2DB). 3. **Comparative Analysis**: The paper compares the differences between layer group classification and space group classification. The traditional approach usually involves obtaining the space group of a three-dimensional bulk structure by periodically repeating the monolayer structure in the direction perpendicular to the two-dimensional lattice (AA stacking), but this method has its shortcomings. 4. **Revealing Issues**: The study finds that for 18% of the monolayer materials in the C2DB database, the space group of their AA-stacked bulk structure cannot uniquely determine their layer group type. This means that the traditional space group classification method has limitations in describing certain 2D materials. Through this work, the paper aims to enhance the understanding of the symmetry of 2D materials and provide more accurate classification tools for related research.

Layer group classification of two-dimensional materials

Symmetry classification of 2D materials: layer groups versus space groups

Topology-Scaling Identification of Layered Solids and Stable Exfoliated 2D Materials

Scanning tables for the layer groups

High-throughput Screening and Classification of Layered Di-Metal Chalcogenides.

Categorization of inorganic crystal structures by Delaunay tetrahedralization

Versatile Optical Determination of Two-Dimensional Atomic Crystal Layers

Comprehensive Study of All Spinful and Spinless Linear Band Crossings in the 80 Layer Groups

Anisotropic properties of monolayer 2D materials: an overview from the C2DB database

Crystallography, Group Cohomology, and Lieb-Schultz-Mattis Constraints

Structure identification methods for atomistic simulations of crystalline materials

A Semi-Supervised Approach for Automatic Crystal Structure Classification

Machine Learning-Based Prediction of Crystal Systems and Space Groups from Inorganic Materials Compositions

Classification of Crystalline Topological Insulators and Superconductors with Point Group Symmetries

Systematic enumeration of crystalline networks with only sp2 configuration in cubic lattices

Materials structure genealogy and high-throughput topological classification of surfaces and 2D materials

Topological Classification of Crystalline Insulators with Space Group Symmetry

Accurate space‐group prediction from composition

Structural, Vibrational and Electronic Properties of Single Layer Hexagonal Crystals of Groups IV and V

Identification of Crystal Symmetry from Noisy Diffraction Patterns by A Shape Analysis and Deep Learning

Interlayer Quasi-Bonding Interactions in 2D Layered Materials: A Classification According to the Occupancy of Involved Energy Bands