Abstract:Context. To date, calculations of planet formation have mainly focused on dynamics, and only a few have considered the chemical composition of refractory elements and compounds in the planetary bodies. While many studies have been concentrating on the chemical composition of volatile compounds (such as H2O, CO, CO2) incorporated in planets, only a few have considered the refractory materials as well, although they are of great importance for the formation of rocky planets. Aims. We computed the abundance of refractory elements in planetary bodies formed in stellar systems with a solar chemical composition by combining models of chemical composition and planet formation. We also considered the formation of refractory organic compounds, which have been ignored in previous studies on this topic. Methods. We used the commercial software package HSC Chemistry to compute the condensation sequence and chemical composition of refractory minerals incorporated into planets. The problem of refractory organic material is approached with two distinct model calculations: the first considers that the fraction of atoms used in the formation of organic compounds is removed from the system (i.e., organic compounds are formed in the gas phase and are non-reactive); and the second assumes that organic compounds are formed by the reaction between different compounds that had previously condensed from the gas phase. Results. Results show that refractory material represents more than 50 wt % of the mass of solids accreted by the simulated planets with up to 30 wt % of the total mass composed of refractory organic compounds. Carbide and silicate abundances are consistent with C/O and Mg/Si elemental ratios of 0.5 and 1.02 for the Sun. Less than 1 wt % of carbides are present in the planets, and pyroxene and olivine are formed in similar quantities. The model predicts planets that are similar in composition to those of the solar system. Starting from a common initial nebula composition, it also shows that a wide variety of chemically different planets can form, which means that the differences in planetary compositions are due to differences in the planetary formation process. Conclusions. We show that a model in which refractory organic material is absent from the system is more compatible with observations. The use of a planet formation model is essential to form a wide diversity of planets in a consistent way.

chemcomp: Modeling the chemical composition of planets formed in protoplanetary disks

A Chemical Modelling Roadmap Linking Protoplanetary Disks and Exoplanet Atmospheres

Chemistry in Protoplanetary Disks

Protoplanetary Disk Chemistry

Chemistry in Disks. IV. Benchmarking gas-grain chemical models with surface reactions

The Chemical Evolution of Protoplanetary Disks

Disk and atmosphere composition of multi-planet systems

Protoplanetary disk chemistry and structure

Chempl: a playable package for modeling interstellar chemistry

A pebbles accretion model with chemistry and implications for the solar system

System-level fractionation of carbon from disk and planetesimal processing

Astrochemistry and compositions of planetary systems

Linking the primordial composition of planet building disks to the present-day composition of rocky exoplanets

Dust Condensation in Evolving Discs and the Composition of Planetary Building Blocks

From stellar nebula to planets: The refractory components

Interpreting the atmospheric composition of exoplanets: sensitivity to planet formation assumptions

Revisiting equilibrium condensation and rocky planet compositions: Introducing the ECCOplanets code

The physical and chemical processes in protoplanetary disks: constraints on the composition of comets

Exoplanet Chemistry

Chemistry in a forming protoplanetary disk: main accretion phase

Gas dynamics around a Jupiter mass planet: II. Chemical evolution of circumplanetary material