Randomized Complexity of Mean Computation and the Adaption Problem

Stefan Heinrich
2024-01-25
Abstract:Recently the adaption problem of Information-Based Complexity (IBC) for linear problems in the randomized setting was solved in Heinrich (J. Complexity 82, 2024, 101821). Several papers treating further aspects of this problem followed. However, all examples obtained so far were vector-valued. In this paper we settle the scalar-valued case. We study the complexity of mean computation in finite dimensional sequence spaces with mixed $L_p^N$ norms. We determine the $n$-th minimal errors in the randomized adaptive and non-adaptive setting. It turns out that among the problems considered there are examples where adaptive and non-adaptive $n$-th minimal errors deviate by a power of $n$. The gap can be (up to log factors) of the order $n^{1/4}$. We also show how to turn such results into infinite dimensional examples with suitable deviation for all $n$ simultaneously.
Numerical Analysis
What problem does this paper attempt to address?
The problem that this paper attempts to solve is the difference between the adaptivity and non - adaptivity of the \(n\) - th minimal error in scalar - valued mean computation under a random setting. Specifically, the author studies the complexity of mean computation with a mixed \(L^p\) norm in a finite - dimensional sequence space and determines the \(n\) - th minimal error in both random adaptive and non - adaptive settings. The research shows that in some problems, the difference between the \(n\) - th minimal error in adaptivity and non - adaptivity can be on the order of a power of \(n\), and the gap can be on the order of \(n^{1/4}\) (ignoring logarithmic factors). In addition, the author also shows how to transform these results into infinite - dimensional examples with appropriate deviations for all \(n\) simultaneously. ### Specific Problem Description 1. **Background**: - The adaptivity problem in Information - Based Complexity (IBC) is to study the efficiency difference between adaptive and non - adaptive methods in solving linear problems. - In the deterministic setting, Gal and Micchelli (1980) and Traub and Woźniakowski (1980) proved that the \(n\) - th minimal error in adaptivity and non - adaptivity differs by at most a constant factor of 2. - Novak (1996) proposed a similar problem in the random setting, that is, whether there exists a constant \(c>0\) such that for all linear problems \(P\) and all \(n\), the non - adaptive random \(n\) - th minimal error does not exceed \(c\) times the adaptive random \(n\) - th minimal error. 2. **Known Results**: - For vector - valued mean computation, Heinrich (2024) proved that in some cases, the gap between the \(n\) - th minimal error in non - adaptivity and adaptivity can reach \(n^{1/8}\) (ignoring logarithmic factors). - For vector - valued approximation problems, Heinrich (2024) proved that the gap can reach \(n^{1/2}\) (ignoring logarithmic factors). 3. **Contributions of This Paper**: - This paper solves the case of scalar - valued mean computation, that is, \(G = \mathbb{K}\) (the real or complex field). - The author proves that in the case of \(1\leq p < 2 < u\leq\infty\), the difference between the \(n\) - th minimal error in adaptivity and non - adaptivity can be on the order of a power of \(n\), and the specific relationship can be seen in equations (98) and (99) of Theorem 4.4. - The author also shows how to extend from a finite - dimensional problem to an infinite - dimensional problem to obtain examples with appropriate deviations for all \(n\) simultaneously. ### Main Conclusions - **Difference between Adaptive and Non - Adaptive Errors**: In some problems, the gap between the \(n\) - th minimal error in adaptivity and non - adaptivity can be on the order of \(n^{1/4}\) (ignoring logarithmic factors). - **Extension to Infinite - Dimensional Problems**: By the method of direct sum, the author shows how to extend from a finite - dimensional problem to an infinite - dimensional problem to preserve the nature of the error difference. ### Mathematical Expressions - **Mean Computation**: \[ I_{N_1, N_2}: L^{p}_{N_1}(L^{u}_{N_2})\to\mathbb{K}, \quad I_{N_1, N_2}f=\frac{1}{N_1N_2}\sum_{i = 1}^{N_1}\sum_{j = 1}^{N_2}f(i, j). \] - **Norm Definition**: \[ \|f\|_{L^p_N}=\left(\frac{1}{N}\sum_{i = 1}^N|f(i)|^p\right)^{1/p}\quad(p < \infty), \quad\|f\|_{L^\infty}