Precise Robotic Weed Spot-Spraying for Reduced Herbicide Usage and Improved Environmental Outcomes -- A Real-World Case Study

Mostafa Rahimi Azghadi,Alex Olsen,Jake Wood,Alzayat Saleh,Brendan Calvert,Terry Granshaw,Emilie Fillols,Bronson Philippa
2024-01-25
Abstract:Precise robotic weed control plays an essential role in precision agriculture. It can help significantly reduce the environmental impact of herbicides while reducing weed management costs for farmers. In this paper, we demonstrate that a custom-designed robotic spot spraying tool based on computer vision and deep learning can significantly reduce herbicide usage on sugarcane farms. We present results from field trials that compare robotic spot spraying against industry-standard broadcast spraying, by measuring the weed control efficacy, the reduction in herbicide usage, and the water quality improvements in irrigation runoff. The average results across 25 hectares of field trials show that spot spraying on sugarcane farms is 97% as effective as broadcast spraying and reduces herbicide usage by 35%, proportionally to the weed density. For specific trial strips with lower weed pressure, spot spraying reduced herbicide usage by up to 65%. Water quality measurements of irrigation-induced runoff, three to six days after spraying, showed reductions in the mean concentration and mean load of herbicides of 39% and 54%, respectively, compared to broadcast spraying. These promising results reveal the capability of spot spraying technology to reduce herbicide usage on sugarcane farms without impacting weed control and potentially providing sustained water quality benefits.
Robotics
What problem does this paper attempt to address?
The problem that this paper attempts to solve is to reduce the amount of herbicide used on sugarcane farms by using a custom - made robotic spot - spraying tool based on computer vision and deep learning, without reducing the weed - control effect and while improving the quality of irrigation return water. Specifically, the paper explores the following points: 1. **Reducing the amount of herbicide used**: Through precise robotic spot - spraying technology, spraying is only carried out where it is needed, rather than overall spraying as in traditional methods, thereby significantly reducing the amount of herbicide used. 2. **Maintaining or improving the weed - control effect**: Ensure that while reducing the amount of herbicide used, the effect of weed control is not affected, that is, ensure that the efficiency of weed control is equivalent to that of traditional overall spraying. 3. **Improving environmental quality**: By reducing the amount of herbicide used, the concentration of herbicide in the irrigation return water is reduced, thereby reducing the impact on the environment, especially water pollution. The paper compares the differences between robotic spot - spraying technology and traditional overall - spraying technology in terms of weed - control effect, the amount of herbicide used, and the quality of irrigation return water through actual field trials in the Burdekin area of Queensland, Australia, in order to verify the achievement of the above - mentioned goals.