Abstract:<p>In the last 50 years there has been a tremendous progress in solving numerically the Navier-Stokes equations using finite differences, finite elements, spectral, and even meshless methods. Yet, in many real cases, we still cannot incorporate seamlessly (multi-fidelity) data into existing algorithms, and for industrial-complexity applications the mesh generation is time consuming and still an art. Moreover, solving ill-posed problems (e.g., lacking boundary conditions) or inverse problems is often prohibitively expensive and requires different formulations and new computer codes. Here, we employ physics-informed neural networks (PINNs), encoding the governing equations directly into the deep neural network via automatic differentiation, to overcome some of the aforementioned limitations for simulating incompressible laminar and turbulent flows. We develop the Navier-Stokes flow nets (NSFnets) by considering two different mathematical formulations of the Navier-Stokes equations: the velocity-pressure (VP) formulation and the vorticity-velocity (VV) formulation. Since this is a new approach, we first select some standard benchmark problems to assess the accuracy, convergence rate, computational cost and flexibility of NSFnets; analytical solutions and direct numerical simulation (DNS) databases provide proper initial and boundary conditions for the NSFnet simulations. The spatial and temporal coordinates are the inputs of the NSFnets, while the instantaneous velocity and pressure fields are the outputs for the VP-NSFnet, and the instantaneous velocity and vorticity fields are the outputs for the VV-NSFnet. This is unsupervised learning and, hence, no labeled data are required beyond boundary and initial conditions and the fluid properties. The residuals of the VP or VV governing equations, together with the initial and boundary conditions, are embedded into the loss function of the NSFnets. No data is provided for the pressure to the VP-NSFnet, which is a hidden state and is obtained via the incompressibility constraint without extra computational cost. Unlike the traditional numerical methods, NSFnets inherit the properties of neural networks (NNs), hence the total error is composed of the approximation, the optimization, and the generalization errors. Here, we empirically attempt to quantify these errors by varying the sampling ("residual") points, the iterative solvers, and the size of the NN architecture. For the laminar flow solutions, we show that both the VP and the VV formulations are comparable in accuracy but their best performance corresponds to different NN architectures. The initial convergence rate is fast but the error eventually saturates to a plateau due to the dominance of the optimization error. For the turbulent channel flow, we show that NSFnets can sustain turbulence at <span class="math"><math>Reτ∼1,000</math></span>, but due to expensive training we only consider part of the channel domain and enforce velocity boundary conditions on the subdomain boundaries provided by the DNS data base. We also perform a systematic study on the weights used in the loss function for balancing the data and physics components, and investigate a new way of computing the weights dynamically to accelerate training and enhance accuracy. In the last part, we demonstrate how NSFnets should be used in practice, namely for ill-posed problems with incomplete or noisy boundary conditions as well as for inverse problems. We obtain reasonably accurate solutions for such cases as well without the need to change the NSFnets and at the same computational cost as in the forward well-posed problems. We also present a simple example of transfer learning that will aid in accelerating the training of NSFnets for different parameter settings.</p>

NSNO: Neumann Series Neural Operator for Solving Helmholtz Equations in Inhomogeneous Medium

NSNO: Neumann Series Neural Operator for Solving Helmholtz Equations in Inhomogeneous Medium

Spectral-Refiner: Fine-Tuning of Accurate Spatiotemporal Neural Operator for Turbulent Flows

U-WNO: U-Net Enhanced Wavelet Neural Operator for Solving Parametric Partial Differential Equations

Koopman neural operator as a mesh-free solver of non-linear partial differential equations

Fourier Neural Operator for Solving Subsurface Oil/Water Two-Phase Flow Partial Differential Equation

Local neural operator for solving transient partial differential equations on varied domains

A Born Fourier Neural Operator for Solving Poisson’s Equation with Limited Data and Arbitrary Domain Deformation

Neumann Series-based Neural Operator for Solving Inverse Medium Problem

Deep Neural Helmholtz Operators for 3D Elastic Wave Propagation and Inversion

SPFNO: Spectral operator learning for PDEs with Dirichlet and Neumann boundary conditions

Soliton, Breather and Rogue Wave Solutions for Solving the Nonlinear Schrödinger Equation Using a Deep Learning Method with Physical Constraints

Wavefield solutions from machine learned functions

NSFnets (Navier-Stokes flow nets): Physics-informed neural networks for the incompressible Navier-Stokes equations

Fourier Neural Operator Networks: A Fast and General Solver for the Photoacoustic Wave Equation

LNO: Laplace Neural Operator for Solving Differential Equations

HNS: An efficient hermite neural solver for solving time-fractional partial differential equations

Large scale scattering using fast solvers based on neural operators

Fast Solver of 2D Maxwell's Equations Based on Fourier Neural Operator

DOSnet as a Non-Black-Box PDE Solver: When Deep Learning Meets Operator Splitting