Abstract:Does every Boolean tautology have a short propositional-calculus proof? Here, a propositional-calculus (i.e. Frege) proof is any proof starting from a set of axioms and deriving new Boolean formulas using a fixed set of sound derivation rules. Establishing any super-polynomial size lower bound on Frege proofs (in terms of the size of the formula proved) is a major open problem in proof complexity, and among a handful of fundamental hardness questions in complexity theory by and large. Non-commutative arithmetic formulas, on the other hand, constitute a quite weak computational model, for which exponential-size lower bounds were shown already back in 1991 by Nisan [20], using a particularly transparent argument. In this work we show that Frege lower bounds in fact follow from corresponding size lower bounds on non-commutative formulas computing certain polynomials (and that such lower bounds on non-commutative formulas must exist, unless NP=coNP ). More precisely, we demonstrate a natural association between tautologies T to non-commutative polynomials p , such that: •if T has a polynomial-size Frege proof then p has a polynomial-size non-commutative arithmetic formula; and conversely, when T is a DNF, if p has a polynomial-size non-commutative arithmetic formula over GF (2) then T has a Frege proof of quasi-polynomial size. The argument is a characterization of Frege proofs as non-commutative formulas: we show that the Frege system is (quasi-) polynomially equivalent to a non-commutative Ideal Proof System (IPS), following the recent work of Grochow and Pitassi [10] that introduced a propositional proof system in which proofs are arithmetic circuits, and the work in [35] that considered adding the commutator as an axiom in algebraic propositional proof systems. This gives a characterization of propositional Frege proofs in terms of (non-commutative) arithmetic formulas that is tighter than (the formula version of IPS) in Grochow and Pitassi [10], in the following sense: (i) The non-commutative IPS is polynomial-time checkable -- whereas the original IPS was checkable in probabilistic polynomial-time; and (ii) Frege proofs unconditionally quasi-polynomially simulate the non-commutative IPS -- whereas Frege was shown to efficiently simulate IPS only assuming that the decidability of PIT for (commutative) arithmetic formulas by polynomial-size circuits is efficiently provable in Frege.

On Pigeonhole Principles and Ramsey in TFNP

Extremal combinatorics, iterated pigeonhole arguments, and generalizations of PPP

PPP-Completeness with Connections to Cryptography

Separations in Proof Complexity and TFNP

Metamathematics of Resolution Lower Bounds: A TFNP Perspective

The tree pigeonhole principle in the Weihrauch degrees

The reverse mathematics of the pigeonhole hierarchy

On Tao's "finitary" infinite pigeonhole principle

Quantum Communication Advantage in TFNP

From Trees to Polynomials and Back Again: New Capacity Bounds with Applications to TSP

Ramsey Theorems for Trees and a General 'Private Learning Implies Online Learning' Theorem

Discrete Fixed Points: Models, Complexities, and Applications

Poset Ramsey number $R(P,Q_n)$. III. Chain Compositions and Antichains

Ramsey numbers for partially ordered sets

A Circuit-Based Proof of Toda′s Theorem

On the algebraic proof complexity of Tensor Isomorphism

Nonuniform Reductions and NP-Completeness

Choiceless Computation and Symmetry: Limitations of Definability

Non-Commutative Formulas and Frege Lower Bounds: a New Characterization of Propositional Proofs.

Fast and effective techniques for T-count reduction via spider nest identities

PTIME Computation of Transitive Closures of Octagonal Relations