Abstract:Problem setting. Artificial intelligence is rapidly affecting the financial sector with countless potential benefits in terms of improving financial services and compliance. In the financial sector, artificial intelligence algorithms are already trusted to account for transactions, detect fraudulent schemes, assess customer creditworthiness, resource planning and reporting. But the introduction of such technologies entails new risks. Analysis of resent researches and publications. The following scientists were engaged in research of the specified question: D.W. Arner, J. Barberis, R.P. Buckley, Jon Truby, Rafael Brown, Andrew Dahdal, O. A. Baranov, O. V. Vinnyk, I. V. Yakovyuk, A. P. Voloshin, A. O. Shovkun, N.B. Patsuriia. Target of research. The aim of the article is to identify key strategic issues in developing mechanisms to ensure the effective implementation and use of artificial intelligence in the financial services market. Article’s main body. The paper investigates an important scientific and practical problem of legal regulation of artificial intelligence used by financial services market participants. The legal risks associated with the use of artificial intelligence programs in a particular area are considered. The most pressing risks to address targeted AI regulation are fundamental rights, data confidentiality, security and effective performance, and accountability. This article argues that the best way to encourage a sustainable future in AI innovation in the financial sector is to support a proactive regulatory approach prior to any financial harm occurring. This article argues that it would be optimal for policymakers to intervene early with targeted, proactive but balanced regulatory approaches to AI technology in the financial sector that are consistent with emerging internationally accepted principles on AI governance. Conclusions and prospects for the development. The adoption of rational regulations that encourage innovation whilst ensuring adherence to international principles will significantly reduce the likelihood that AI-related risks will develop into systemic problems. Leaving the financial sector only with voluntary codes of practice may encourage experimentation that in turn may result in innovative benefits – but it will definitely render customers vulnerable, institutions exposed and the entire financial system weakened.

AI, insurance, discrimination and unfair differentiation. An overview and research agenda

How Artificial Intelligence Effect the Fairness of Financial Industry

AI and ethics in insurance: a new solution to mitigate proxy discrimination in risk modeling

Evaluating the impact of AI on insurance: The four emerging AI- and data-driven business models

Use of Artificial Intelligence in the Indian Insurance Sector, including Healthcare Companies

Big data, risk classification, and privacy in insurance markets

Insurance Discrimination and Fairness in the Age of Artificial Intelligence under Japanese Law

Three and a half decades of artificial intelligence in banking, financial services, and insurance: A systematic evolutionary review

Adversarial Artificial Intelligence in Insurance: From an Example to Some Potential Remedies

The Fairness of Machine Learning in Insurance: New Rags for an Old Man?

A Survey on AI Implementation in Finance, (Cyber) Insurance and Financial Controlling

Survey on Insurance Claim analysis using Natural Language Processing and Machine Learning

Foundational AI in Insurance and Real Estate: A Survey of Applications, Challenges, and Future Directions

Influence of Artificial Intelligence on Credit Risk Assessment in Banking Sector

Peculiarities of application of artificial intelligence in the financial services sector: EU experience

Melting contestation: insurance fairness and machine learning

A Discussion of Discrimination and Fairness in Insurance Pricing

Adversarial AI in Insurance: Pervasiveness and Resilience

Explainable Artificial Intelligence (XAI) in Insurance

Bias in data‐driven artificial intelligence systems—An introductory survey

Insurance Discrimination and Fairness in Machine Learning: An Ethical Analysis