A Stable Matching Assignment for Cancer Treatment Centers using Survival Analysis

Navid Seidi
2024-01-19
Abstract:The treatment of cancer is one of the most discussed issues in the realm of contemporary public health research. One of the primary concerns of both the general public and the government is the development of the most effective cancer treatment at the most affordable price. This is due to the fact that the number of persons diagnosed with cancer increases on an annual basis. Within the scope of this project, we propose the development of a system for the recommendation of treatment centers. This system would initially select patients who posed a higher risk value, and then it would recommend the most appropriate cancer treatment center for those patients based on their income and the location where they lived using a stable matching algorithm.
Computer Science and Game Theory,Computers and Society
What problem does this paper attempt to address?
The problem that this paper attempts to solve is: how to recommend the most suitable treatment centers for cancer patients to ensure that high - risk patients can obtain the most appropriate treatment, taking into account the patients' economic status and place of residence. Specifically, this study aims to develop a system. This system first determines the relative risk value of patients through survival analysis, and then, based on factors such as the patient's risk value, income level and place of residence, uses the stable matching algorithm to recommend the most suitable cancer treatment centers. ### Problem Background As the incidence of cancer has been increasing year by year, providing efficient and affordable cancer treatment has become an important issue in public health research. The number of newly - added cancer cases is increasing every year, which makes how to rationally allocate limited medical resources an urgent problem to be solved. Especially for those high - risk patients, how to ensure that they can obtain the best treatment services under the condition that their economic conditions permit has become the focus of the study. ### Research Objectives 1. **Risk Assessment**: Calculate the relative risk score (Risk Score) of each patient through survival analysis, so as to screen out high - risk patients. 2. **Resource Allocation**: Based on the patients' economic status and place of residence, use the stable matching algorithm to recommend the most suitable cancer treatment centers for these high - risk patients. 3. **Optimized Matching**: Ensure that each available treatment bed can be effectively utilized and avoid waste of resources. ### Method Overview 1. **Survival Analysis**: - Use survival analysis models (such as Cox Proportional Hazards Model, Deep Survival Machines, etc.) to calculate the relative risk score of each patient. - According to the predefined risk threshold (Risk Threshold, \( T_{rs} \)), screen out high - risk patients that need further processing. 2. **Stable Matching Algorithm**: - Construct a bipartite graph, where one side is the set of patients \( P=\{p_i|i\in N, 1 < i < n\} \) and the other side is the set of cancer treatment centers \( C = \{c_j|j\in N, 1 < j < m\} \). - Each patient and treatment center has relevant attributes, such as the patient's geographical location \( l_p \), annual income \( a_p \) and risk score \( r_s \), as well as the treatment cost \( t_c \), the number of available beds \( s_b \) and the geographical location \( l_c \) of the treatment center. - Define the matching conditions: the treatment cost must be within the patient's affordable range (\( a_c < t_c \)), and the distance of the treatment center must be within an acceptable range (\( |l_c - l_p| < T_{ad} \)). - Use the stable matching algorithm to find the optimal matching scheme to ensure that each available bed can be fully utilized. ### Conclusion By combining survival analysis and stable matching algorithm, this study aims to provide personalized treatment center recommendations for high - risk cancer patients, thereby improving the treatment effect and optimizing the allocation of medical resources.