Abstract:The advent of large language models (LLMs) has enabled significant performance gains in the field of natural language processing. However, recent studies have found that LLMs often resort to shortcuts when performing tasks, creating an illusion of enhanced performance while lacking generalizability in their decision rules. This phenomenon introduces challenges in accurately assessing natural language understanding in LLMs. Our paper provides a concise survey of relevant research in this area and puts forth a perspective on the implications of shortcut learning in the evaluation of language models, specifically for NLU tasks. This paper urges more research efforts to be put towards deepening our comprehension of shortcut learning, contributing to the development of more robust language models, and raising the standards of NLU evaluation in real-world scenarios.

What problem does this paper attempt to address?

This paper focuses on the problem of excessive reliance on "shortcut learning" in large language models (LLMs) for natural language understanding (NLU) tasks. Despite their impressive performance in various NLP tasks, studies have found that LLMs often rely on surface clues or biases in the dataset to complete tasks rather than truly understanding semantics, which leads to limited generalization ability on out-of-distribution samples. The paper emphasizes the challenges this phenomenon poses for evaluating NLU models and proposes the need for further research to deepen the understanding of shortcut learning in order to build more robust language models and improve the standards of NLU evaluation. Shortcut learning refers to the model's reliance on surface features in the training data for prediction instead of learning underlying semantics. It can result in excellent performance on in-distribution samples but poor performance on out-of-distribution samples. Research has revealed how models exploit specific keywords, statistical hints, and language variations for prediction. Identifying and mitigating these shortcuts are current research focuses, including creating adversarial datasets and adopting model-centric approaches (such as representation layer debiasing) to improve model generalization. However, removing shortcuts may affect the model's performance on standard test sets and even lead to overfitting and calibration issues, where the model is overly confident in incorrect predictions. The paper also discusses the impact of language and lexical variations and the necessity of enhancing model adaptability in different language environments. Furthermore, dealing with generalization of out-of-distribution data remains a challenge, and strategies need to be developed to evaluate model performance across diverse data distributions. The paper concludes by stating that understanding and quantifying the impact of removing shortcuts on model performance is crucial, while also reevaluating the motivational mechanisms for reducing training loss to avoid over-reliance on surface features. In summary, the paper calls for collaborative efforts within the NLP community to enhance the understanding of shortcut learning, develop more powerful language models, and improve the reliability of NLU evaluation in real-world scenarios.

Learning Shortcuts: On the Misleading Promise of NLU in Language Models

Do LLMs Overcome Shortcut Learning? An Evaluation of Shortcut Challenges in Large Language Models

Shortcut Learning in In-Context Learning: A Survey

Navigating the Shortcut Maze: A Comprehensive Analysis of Shortcut Learning in Text Classification by Language Models

Shortcut Learning Explanations for Deep Natural Language Processing: A Survey on Dataset Biases

Shortcut Learning of Large Language Models in Natural Language Understanding

Shortcut learning in deep neural networks

ShortcutLens: A Visual Analytics Approach for Exploring Shortcuts in Natural Language Understanding Dataset

Easy Problems That LLMs Get Wrong

Don't Make Your LLM an Evaluation Benchmark Cheater

Student Data Paradox and Curious Case of Single Student-Tutor Model: Regressive Side Effects of Training LLMs for Personalized Learning

Lost in Inference: Rediscovering the Role of Natural Language Inference for Large Language Models

Language Models Learn to Mislead Humans via RLHF

Exploring LLMs as a Source of Targeted Synthetic Textual Data to Minimize High Confidence Misclassifications

LLMs' Understanding of Natural Language Revealed

Demonstrating and Reducing Shortcuts in Vision-Language Representation Learning

The Vulnerability of Language Model Benchmarks: Do They Accurately Reflect True LLM Performance?

Tackling Shortcut Learning in Deep Neural Networks: An Iterative Approach with Interpretable Models

On the Foundations of Shortcut Learning