Abstract:We study the problem of optimal games for the solo and coop modes of the board game Room 25 (season 1). We show that the game cannot be won in a single turn for any starting configuration, but that it can be done in two for some configurations. We introduce an opening that wins in two turns with enough luck, while having a low probability of losing immediately. We then show that the game can be won in a single turn if the game's rules are slightly modified, although the probability of winning then becomes substantially lower than in the two-turn strategy. At last, we show that if the players are maximally unlucky, they will lose regardless of their strategy.
What problem does this paper attempt to address?
The problem that this paper attempts to solve is: In the first season of the game "Room 25", for the single - player mode and the cooperative mode, whether there exists an optimal solution so that players can win in the fewest number of rounds. Specifically, the author explores the following issues:
1. **Whether it is possible to win in one round**:
- The paper proves that regardless of the initial configuration, it is **impossible to win in one round**. This is mainly due to the game rules that limit the way of moving from the starting position (denoted as \( D \)) and, in particular, prohibit pushing other characters from \( D \).
2. **Whether it is possible to win in two rounds**:
- The paper proposes a "fast start" strategy, which can make players win **in two rounds** under certain conditions. These conditions include that certain key positions in the starting configuration need specific types of blocks (such as empty rooms or black rooms), and players need a certain amount of luck.
3. **Possibilities after changing the rules**:
- If the rules are slightly modified (for example, allowing pushing other characters from \( D \)), it is possible to **win in one round** in some cases, but the probability of success will be significantly reduced.
4. **Results in the worst - case scenario**:
- The paper also explores whether players will fail if they always encounter the worst - case scenario (the so - called "adversarial environment"). The results show that in this case, the opponent can always force the player to fail because the opponent can choose to place deadly rooms and vortices to prevent the player from advancing.
### Formulas and Conclusions
- **The minimum number of rounds to win**: According to the analysis in the paper, **at least two rounds** are required to ensure victory.
\[
\text{The minimum number of rounds to win} = 2
\]
- **Probability of success**:
- For the "fast start", the probability of being "V - lucky" is approximately 7.39%, and the probability of immediate failure is approximately 1.42%.
- For the "bold start", the probability of being "T - lucky" is only approximately 0.36%, and the probability of immediate failure is at least 31.2%.
\[
P(\text{V - lucky})=\frac{17}{230}\approx7.39\%
\]
\[
P(\text{Immediate failure | Fast start})\leq\frac{18}{1265}\approx1.42\%
\]
\[
P(\text{T - lucky})=\frac{1}{276}\approx0.36\%
\]
\[
P(\text{Immediate failure | Bold start})\geq\frac{43}{138}\approx31.2\%
\]
### Summary
Through strict mathematical proofs and probability analysis, the paper shows the existence of optimal solutions and the possibility of implementation in the game "Room 25" under different conditions and rules. Although it is impossible to win in one round, winning in two rounds can be achieved under specific conditions, and in the worst - case scenario, the player will inevitably fail.