Abstract:We consider two-player stochastic games played on finite graphs with reachability objectives where the first player tries to ensure a target state to be visited almost-surely (i.e., with probability 1), or positively (i.e., with positive probability), no matter the strategy of the second player. We classify such games according to the information and the power of randomization available to the players. On the basis of information, the game can be one-sided with either (a) player 1, or (b) player 2 having partial observation (and the other player has perfect observation), or two-sided with (c) both players having partial observation. On the basis of randomization, the players (a) may not be allowed to use randomization (pure strategies), or (b) may choose a probability distribution over actions but the actual random choice is external and not visible to the player (actions invisible), or (c) may use full randomization. Our main results for pure strategies are as follows. (1) For one-sided games with player 1 having partial observation we show that (in contrast to full randomized strategies) belief-based (subset-construction based) strategies are not sufficient, and we present an exponential upper bound on memory both for almostsure and positive winning strategies; we show that the problem of deciding the existence of almost-sure and positive winning strategies for player 1 is EXPTIME-complete. (2) For one-sided games with player 2 having partial observation we show that non-elementary memory is both necessary and sufficient for both almost-sure and positive winning strategies. (3) We show that for the general (two-sided) case finite-memory strategies are sufficient for both positive and almost-sure winning, and at least non-elementary memory is required. We establish the equivalence of the almost-sure winning problems for pure strategies and for randomized strategies with actions invisible. Our equivalence result exhibits serious flaws in previous results of the literature: we show a non-elementary memory lower bound for almost-sure winning whereas an exponential upper bound was previously claimed.

Optimal games in Room 25 solo and coop modes

At Most 43 Moves, At Least 29: Optimal Strategies and Bounds for Ultimate Tic-Tac-Toe

An optimal MOO strategy

From Local To Global Optimality in Concurrent Parity Games

Optimal Strategy in "Guess Who?": Beyond Binary Search

Partial-Observation Stochastic Games: How to Win When Belief Fails

The Optimal Way to Play the Most Difficult Repeated Coordination Games

Optimal minimax strategy in a dice game

Optimal protocols for the most difficult repeated coordination games

Playing Against Fair Adversaries in Stochastic Games with Total Rewards

Advances in finding ideal play on poset games

Two-player Domino games

What's the Best Seat in the Game Left, Center, Right?

Strategy Complexity of Reachability in Countable Stochastic 2-Player Games

Misère Connect Four is Solved

Optimal strategies in collective Parrondo games

Optimal Machine Strategies To Commit To In Two-Person Repeated Games

Faster Algorithms for Optimal Ex-Ante Coordinated Collusive Strategies in Extensive-Form Zero-Sum Games

Synthesising Strategy Improvement and Recursive Algorithms for Solving 2.5 Player Parity Games

Winning Without Observing Payoffs: Exploiting Behavioral Biases to Win Nearly Every Round