Explicit design optimization of air rudders for maximizing stiffness and fundamental frequency

Yibo Jia,Wen Meng,Zongliang Du,Chang Liu,Shanwei Li,Conglei Wang,Zhifu Ge,Ruiyi Su,Xu Guo
2024-01-17
Abstract:In aerospace engineering, there is a growing demand for lightweight design through topology optimization. This paper presents a novel design optimization method for stiffened air rudders, commonly used for aircraft attitude control, based on the Moving Morphable Components (MMC) method. The stiffeners within the irregular enclosed design domain are modeled as MMCs and discretized by shell elements, accurately capturing their geometry and evolution during optimization process using explicit parameters. In order to maximize the stiffness and fundamental frequency of the rudder structures, numerical analysis algorithms were developed with shape sensitivity analysis conducted. To comply with the manufacturing requirement, a minimum thickness is prescribed for the stiffeners. Penalty strategies were developed for the thickness and density of stiffeners with thickness smaller than the threshold to meet the thickness requirement and suppress spurious modes. The method's effectiveness was demonstrated through optimization examples of two typical air rudders, illustrating the significance of stiffener's distribution on design objectives. The explicit modeling characteristics allow for directly importing the optimization results into CAD systems, significantly enhancing the engineering applicability.
Optimization and Control
What problem does this paper attempt to address?
The problem that this paper attempts to solve is in aerospace engineering, to achieve the lightweight design of the air rudder structure through topological optimization, while maximizing its stiffness and fundamental frequency. Specifically, the paper proposes a new design optimization method based on the Moving Morphable Components (MMC) method to optimize the layout of stiffeners in the enhanced air rudder, so as to improve the structural performance and achieve weight reduction. In order to meet the manufacturing requirements, the stiffeners are given a minimum thickness limit, and a corresponding penalty strategy is developed to control the thickness and density, thereby meeting the thickness requirements and suppressing spurious modes. In addition, the explicit modeling feature allows the optimization results to be directly imported into the CAD system, significantly improving the engineering applicability. ### Key issues: 1. **Lightweight design**: Achieve the lightweight of the air rudder structure through topological optimization. 2. **Maximize stiffness**: Optimize the layout of stiffeners to improve the stiffness of the air rudder. 3. **Maximize fundamental frequency**: Optimize the structural design to improve the fundamental frequency of the air rudder. 4. **Manufacturing requirements**: Ensure the minimum thickness of the stiffeners and avoid the occurrence of spurious modes. ### Solutions: - **Moving Morphable Components (MMC) method**: Use explicit geometric parameters to describe the stiffeners, and adjust the position, shape and thickness of the stiffeners by optimizing these parameters. - **Shape sensitivity analysis**: Develop a numerical analysis algorithm to conduct shape sensitivity analysis to guide the optimization process. - **Penalty strategy**: Introduce a penalty strategy to control the thickness and density of the stiffeners to ensure that the manufacturing requirements are met and spurious modes are suppressed. ### Main contributions: - Propose a new MMC method suitable for air rudder structure optimization. - Develop a shape sensitivity analysis algorithm for optimizing stiffness and fundamental frequency. - Ensure the minimum thickness requirement of the stiffeners through the penalty strategy and improve the manufacturing feasibility of the design. - The explicit modeling feature enables the optimization results to be directly imported into the CAD system, enhancing the engineering applicability. ### Experimental verification: The paper demonstrates the effectiveness of the proposed method through two typical air rudder optimization examples, proving the important influence of the stiffener distribution on the design objectives.