Abstract:Face masks are one of the cheapest and most effective non-pharmaceutical interventions available against airborne diseases such as COVID-19. Unfortunately, they have been met with resistance by a substantial fraction of the populace, especially in the U.S. In this study, we uncover the latent moral values that underpin the response to the mask mandate, and paint them against the country's political backdrop. We monitor the discussion about masks on Twitter, which involves almost 600k users in a time span of 7 months. By using a combination of graph mining, natural language processing, topic modeling, content analysis, and time series analysis, we characterize the responses to the mask mandate of both those in favor and against them. We base our analysis on the theoretical frameworks of Moral Foundation Theory and Hofstede's cultural dimensions. Our results show that, while the anti-mask stance is associated with a conservative political leaning, the moral values expressed by its adherents diverge from the ones typically used by conservatives. In particular, the expected emphasis on the values of authority and purity is accompanied by an atypical dearth of in-group loyalty. We find that after the mandate, both pro- and anti-mask sides decrease their emphasis on care about others, and increase their attention on authority and fairness, further politicizing the issue. In addition, the mask mandate reverses the expression of Individualism-Collectivism between the two sides, with an increase of individualism in the anti-mask narrative, and a decrease in the pro-mask one. We argue that monitoring the dynamics of moral positioning is crucial for designing effective public health campaigns that are sensitive to the underlying values of the target audience.

Moral Values Underpinning COVID-19 Online Communication Patterns

Public Moral Motivation During the COVID-19 Pandemic: Analysis of Posts on Chinese Social Media

Pandemic Culture Wars: Partisan Differences in the Moral Language of COVID-19 Discussions

Emotion Regulation and Dynamics of Moral Concerns During the Early COVID-19 Pandemic

Moral and emotional influences on attitude stability towards COVID-19 vaccines on social media

The impact of pandemic mental cognition on cultural values: an empirical study based on social media

COVID-19 policies and the arising of debate on twitter

Authority without Care: Moral Values behind the Mask Mandate Response

COVID-19 and social media: Beyond polarization

Unraveling Moral and Emotional Discourses on Social Media: a Study of Three Cases

Analyzing COVID-19 on online social media: Trends, sentiments and emotions

Morality in the echo chamber: The relationship between belief in COVID-19 conspiracy theories and public health support and the mediating role of moral identity and morality-as-cooperation across 67 countries

Rise and Fall of the Global Conversation and Shifting Sentiments During the COVID-19 Pandemic

Corona and value change. The role of social media and emotional contagion

Moral decision-making and mental health during the COVID-19 pandemic

The MAD Model of Moral Contagion: The Role of Motivation, Attention, and Design in the Spread of Moralized Content Online

#EpiTwitter: Public Health Messaging During the COVID-19 Pandemic

Morality-Based Assertion and Homophily on Social Media: A Cultural Comparison Between English and Japanese Languages

Moral foundations are better predictors of belief in COVID-19 conspiracy theories than the Big Five personality traits

Debate on online social networks at the time of COVID-19: An Italian case study