Are self-explanations from Large Language Models faithful?

Andreas Madsen,Sarath Chandar,Siva Reddy

2024-05-17

Abstract:Instruction-tuned Large Language Models (LLMs) excel at many tasks and will even explain their reasoning, so-called self-explanations. However, convincing and wrong self-explanations can lead to unsupported confidence in LLMs, thus increasing risk. Therefore, it's important to measure if self-explanations truly reflect the model's behavior. Such a measure is called interpretability-faithfulness and is challenging to perform since the ground truth is inaccessible, and many LLMs only have an inference API. To address this, we propose employing self-consistency checks to measure faithfulness. For example, if an LLM says a set of words is important for making a prediction, then it should not be able to make its prediction without these words. While self-consistency checks are a common approach to faithfulness, they have not previously been successfully applied to LLM self-explanations for counterfactual, feature attribution, and redaction explanations. Our results demonstrate that faithfulness is explanation, model, and task-dependent, showing self-explanations should not be trusted in general. For example, with sentiment classification, counterfactuals are more faithful for Llama2, feature attribution for Mistral, and redaction for Falcon 40B.

Computation and Language,Artificial Intelligence,Machine Learning

What problem does this paper attempt to address?

The problem that this paper attempts to solve is whether the self - explanations provided by large language models (LLMs) truly reflect the behavior of the models, that is, whether these explanations have interpretability - faithfulness. Specifically, the author focuses on how to evaluate the authenticity and reliability of the self - explanations generated by LLMs, because inaccurate but convincing self - explanations may lead to an unfounded increase in confidence in the model's capabilities, thus bringing risks. To meet this challenge, the paper proposes a method based on self - consistency checks to measure the authenticity of explanations. This method is applicable to counterfactual explanations, importance - measure explanations, and ablative explanations, and can be implemented through the model's inference API without accessing the model's internal structure or parameters. Through this method, the author aims to provide a general framework to evaluate the authenticity of explanations under different tasks and models, thereby providing support for improving the transparency and credibility of LLMs.