The Afterlives of Shakespeare and Company in Online Social Readership

Maria Antoniak,David Mimno,Rosamond Thalken,Melanie Walsh,Matthew Wilkens,Gregory Yauney

2024-01-15

Abstract:The growth of social reading platforms such as Goodreads and LibraryThing enables us to analyze reading activity at very large scale and in remarkable detail. But twenty-first century systems give us a perspective only on contemporary readers. Meanwhile, the digitization of the lending library records of Shakespeare and Company provides a window into the reading activity of an earlier, smaller community in interwar Paris. In this article, we explore the extent to which we can make comparisons between the Shakespeare and Company and Goodreads communities. By quantifying similarities and differences, we can identify patterns in how works have risen or fallen in popularity across these datasets. We can also measure differences in how works are received by measuring similarities and differences in co-reading patterns. Finally, by examining the complete networks of co-readership, we can observe changes in the overall structures of literary reception.

Computation and Language

What problem does this paper attempt to address?

The paper attempts to address the issue of exploring the popularity and change patterns of literary works over different periods by comparing the borrowing records of the early 20th-century Paris Shakespeare and Company (SC) bookstore with user review data on the modern social reading platform Goodreads. Specifically, the researchers aim to quantify the similarities and differences between the two communities, identify which works have maintained high popularity over the past century, which works have seen a decline or rise in popularity, and explore the reasons behind these changes.

The research mainly focuses on the following aspects:
1. **Comparison of basic attributes of works**: The researchers first compared the basic attributes of books in the two datasets and found that despite a century's gap, nearly 20% of the most borrowed works in SC were also the most reviewed works on Goodreads.
2. **Co-reading patterns of books**: Using network analysis methods, the researchers discovered that some books had very similar co-reading patterns in both communities, indicating that the reception environment for certain literary works can remain stable across different historical contexts.
3. **Overall comparison of network structures**: Further analysis of the network structures of the two communities revealed that the core status of certain books did not change significantly in both communities, but the popularity of some books had changed markedly.

In summary, this paper aims to reveal the changing trends in the popularity of literary works over different historical periods by comparing and analyzing data from SC and Goodreads, thereby providing new perspectives for understanding the formation mechanisms of classic literary works.