Abstract:Purpose Researchers have noticed that in efficiency assessment, some attributes exhibit specializations including non-discretionary, non-controllable or undesirable. This paper aims to focus on other special factors which have target levels to achieve, i.e. the inputs (outputs) are no longer the-less-the-better (the-more-the-better). Design/methodology/approach In this paper, the authors further study the target variables when some attributes have multiple levels of targets. Such a situation can be found in many operational efficiency evaluations with various targets or bounded scale in inputs or outputs. They suppose that decision-making units (DMUs), reaching any target level, are identical efficient. To some extent, it is mitigation between common targets and individual targets. Using the closest target rule, the authors propose a target-level-oriented method to evaluate DMUs locally. Findings First, the authors found that some factors have multiple levels of targets to improve its efficiency in real world practice. Second, the proposed technique is able to deal with the multiple-levels-targets problems in data envelopment analysis (DEA) framework. Third, the decision-maker can select the improvement directions more freely than that in the traditional setting. Originality/value First, this is the first paper to discuss the multiple-levels-targets problems in DEA framework. Second, the proposed technique can help the decision-maker to select the best improvement strategies. Third, the technique developed in this paper can be used in many areas. For example, it can support the environmental efficiency evaluation with different standards of pollution emission.

Counterfactual Analysis and Target Setting in Benchmarking

Bounded-change Target-Setting Approach: Selection of a Realistic Benchmarking Path.

Two-step benchmarking: Setting more realistically achievable targets in DEA

Analysis on Quantification of Big and Small Mark-Post in Benchmarking

Benchmarking within a DEA framework: setting the closest targets and identifying peer groups with the most similar performances

Target Setting with Minimum Improving Costs in Data Envelopment Analysis: A Mixed Integer Linear Programming Approach

Planning improvements through Data Envelopment Analysis (DEA) benchmarking based on a selection of peers

DEA target setting approach within the cross efficiency framework

Benchmarking with data envelopment analysis: An agency perspective

Alternative Secondary Goals in Multiplicative Two-Stage Data Envelopment Analysis

Performance evaluation through DEA benchmarking adjusted to goals

Fair Target Setting for Intermediate Products in Two-Stage Systems with Data Envelopment Analysis

Stepwise benchmarking based on production function: Selecting path towards closest target

Closest Target for the Orientation-Free Context-Dependent DEA under Variable Returns to Scale.

A Bilevel DEA Model for Efficiency Evaluation and Target Setting with Stochastic Conditions

Additive Integer-Valued DEA Models with Fuzzy Undesirable Outputs: Closest Benchmarking Targets and Super-Efficiency

Target intermediate products setting in a two-stage system with fairness concern

Modeling Multiple Levels of Targets in Operational Efficiency Evaluation with DEA

An Equitable DEA-based Approach for Assigning Fixed Resources along with Targets

Extended Secondary Goal Models for Weights Selection in DEA Cross-Efficiency Evaluation.

Data envelopment analysis models or the virtual gap analysis model: Which should be used for identifying the best benchmark for each unit in a group?