Abstract:Trapping refers to the event when a household falls into the area of poverty. Households that live or fall into the area of poverty are said to be in a poverty trap, where a poverty trap is a state of poverty from which it is difficult to escape without external help. Similarly, extreme poverty is considered as the most severe type of poverty, in which households experience severe deprivation of basic human needs. In this article, we consider an Omega risk process with deterministic growth and a multiplicative jump (collapse) structure to model the capital of a household. It is assumed that, when a household's capital level is above a certain capital barrier level that determines a household's eligibility for a capital cash transfer programme, its capital grows exponentially. As soon as its capital falls below the capital barrier level, the capital dynamics incorporate external support in the form of direct transfers (capital cash transfers) provided by donors or governments. Otherwise, once trapped, the capital grows only due to the capital cash transfers. Under this model, we first derive closed-form expressions for the trapping probability and then do the same for the probability of extreme poverty, which only depends on the current value of the capital given by some extreme poverty rate function. Numerical examples illustrate the role of capital cash transfers on poverty and extreme poverty dynamics.

What problem does this paper attempt to address?

This paper examines the role of direct capital cash transfers in alleviating poverty and extreme poverty using a mathematical model called the Omega risk process. The model assumes that household capital grows exponentially when it is above a certain capital threshold, and below this threshold, the capital dynamics include external assistance, namely direct transfer payments provided by donors or governments. In the study, the authors first obtain closed-form expressions for the probability of falling into poverty and then apply the same approach to the probability of falling into extreme poverty. Numerical examples illustrate the impact of capital cash transfers on poverty and extreme poverty dynamics. The paper notes that although World Bank data shows a decline in the proportion of people living in poverty since 1990, this decline has slowed in recent years, especially after the COVID-19 crisis, and global poverty may increase for the first time. Therefore, reducing poverty is a global priority, and cash transfer programs are seen as one of the main social protection strategies for poverty reduction. These programs are typically divided into conditional and unconditional transfers, with the former requiring beneficiaries to meet specific behavioral conditions and the latter not having this requirement. The paper extends previous research through a theoretical framework that considers household capital behavior below the poverty line and analyzes how unconditional cash transfers may affect the likelihood of families falling into poverty and extreme poverty. The study demonstrates that even small-scale regular cash transfers can contribute to improving living standards and reducing extreme poverty, thereby mitigating the economic costs of poverty. The main contribution of the paper is the study of how unconditional cash transfers affect poverty dynamics, particularly in reducing the probability of falling into poverty and extreme poverty, through a mathematical model. It also distinguishes between poverty and extreme poverty, highlighting the severity of extreme poverty and the importance of preventing it. Finally, the paper provides specific probability formulas and numerical examples to illustrate poverty dynamics under different parameter settings.

The Role of Direct Capital Cash Transfers Towards Poverty and Extreme Poverty Alleviation -- An Omega Risk Process

The role of direct capital cash transfers towards poverty and extreme poverty alleviation - an omega risk process

The Gerber-Shiu Expected Discounted Penalty Function: An Application to Poverty Trapping

On the impact of insurance on households susceptible to random proportional losses: An analysis of poverty trapping

Capital Assets and Poverty Transitions in Rural China

Poverty Dynamics and Poverty Traps among Refugee and Host Communities in Uganda

Escaping the poverty trap: modeling the interplay between economic growth and the ecology of infectious disease

Tackling psychosocial and capital constraints to alleviate poverty

Growth, Poverty Trap and Escape

Endogenous health risks, poverty traps, and the roles of health insurance in poverty alleviation

Risk preferences and poverty traps in the uptake of credit and insurance amongst small-scale farmers in South Africa

Alleviating multi-dimensional poverty through land transfer: Evidence from poverty-stricken villages in China

The dynamics of poverty:Evidences from hazard analysis

Nber Working Paper Series a Solution to Two Paradoxes of International Capital Flows

The Effect of Public Transfers on Physical and Human Capital Accumulation

A Solution to Two Paradoxes of International Capital Flows

The risk of clustering of deprivations in Spain: a tale of two crises

RECOUP Working Paper 11. Education and the Poverty Trapin Rural China.

The Impact of Foreign Capital Inflows on Agriculture Development and Poverty Reduction: Panel Data Analysis for Developing Countries

Evolution of stakeholders’ behavioral strategies in the ecological compensation mechanism for poverty alleviation

Population growth and the transfer paradox in an overlapping generations model