Abstract:Recently, many large language models (LLMs) have been proposed, showing advanced proficiency in code generation. Meanwhile, many efforts have been dedicated to evaluating LLMs on code generation benchmarks such as HumanEval. Although being very helpful for comparing different LLMs, existing evaluation focuses on a sim-ple code generation scenario (i.e., function-level or statement-level code generation), which mainly asks LLMs to generate one single code unit (e.g., a function or a statement) for the given natural language description. Such evaluation focuses on generating independent and often small-scale code units, thus leaving it unclear how LLMs perform in real-world software development scenarios. To fill this knowledge gap, we make the first attempt to evaluate LLMs in a more challenging code generation scenario, i.e., class-level code generation. Compared with existing code generation benchmarks, it better reflects real-world software development scenarios due to it comprising broader contextual dependencies and multiple, interdependent units of code. We first manually construct the first class-level code generation benchmark ClassEval of 100 class-level Python code generation tasks with approximately 500 person-hours. Based on the new benchmark ClassEval, we then perform the first study of 11 state-of-the-art LLMs on class-level code generation. Based on our results, we find that all LLMs perform much worse on class-level code generation compared to the method-level. While GPT models still dominate other LLMs on class-level code generation, the performance rankings of other models on method-level code generation no longer holds for class-level code generation. Besides, most models (except GPT models) perform better when generating the class method by method; and they have the limited ability of generating dependent code. Based on our findings, we call for software engineering (SE) researchers' expertise to build more LLM benchmarks based on practical and complicated software development scenarios.

Leveraging Print Debugging to Improve Code Generation in Large Language Models

Teaching Large Language Models to Self-Debug

DebugBench: Evaluating Debugging Capability of Large Language Models

LDB: A Large Language Model Debugger via Verifying Runtime Execution Step-by-step

From Code to Correctness: Closing the Last Mile of Code Generation with Hierarchical Debugging

Fixing Code Generation Errors for Large Language Models

Effective Large Language Model Debugging with Best-first Tree Search

What's Wrong with Your Code Generated by Large Language Models? An Extensive Study

A Deep Dive into Large Language Model Code Generation Mistakes: What and Why?

Debugging with Open-Source Large Language Models: An Evaluation

ROCODE: Integrating Backtracking Mechanism and Program Analysis in Large Language Models for Code Generation

Think Outside the Code: Brainstorming Boosts Large Language Models in Code Generation

On the Effectiveness of Large Language Models in Domain-Specific Code Generation

Enhancing the Code Debugging Ability of LLMs via Communicative Agent Based Data Refinement

Enabling Programming Thinking in Large Language Models Toward Code Generation

MdEval: Massively Multilingual Code Debugging

Fixing Large Language Models' Specification Misunderstanding for Better Code Generation

Evaluating Large Language Models in Class-Level Code Generation

What Makes Large Language Models Reason in (Multi-Turn) Code Generation?

LEVER: Learning to Verify Language-to-Code Generation with Execution

How to Teach Programming in the AI Era? Using LLMs as a Teachable Agent for Debugging