An Automatic Cascaded Model for Hemorrhagic Stroke Segmentation and Hemorrhagic Volume Estimation

Weijin Xu,Zhuang Sha,Huihua Yang,Rongcai Jiang,Zhanying Li,Wentao Liu,Ruisheng Su
2024-01-09
Abstract:Hemorrhagic Stroke (HS) has a rapid onset and is a serious condition that poses a great health threat. Promptly and accurately delineating the bleeding region and estimating the volume of bleeding in Computer Tomography (CT) images can assist clinicians in treatment planning, leading to improved treatment outcomes for patients. In this paper, a cascaded 3D model is constructed based on UNet to perform a two-stage segmentation of the hemorrhage area in CT images from rough to fine, and the hemorrhage volume is automatically calculated from the segmented area. On a dataset with 341 cases of hemorrhagic stroke CT scans, the proposed model provides high-quality segmentation outcome with higher accuracy (DSC 85.66%) and better computation efficiency (6.2 second per sample) when compared to the traditional Tada formula with respect to hemorrhage volume estimation.
Image and Video Processing,Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition
What problem does this paper attempt to address?
The problem that this paper attempts to solve is to quickly and accurately delineate the area of intracerebral hemorrhage in computed tomography (CT) images and estimate the amount of bleeding. Specifically, the author constructed a cascaded 3D model based on UNet for segmenting the bleeding area from coarse to fine in two stages and automatically calculating the bleeding volume from the segmented area. This method aims to assist clinicians in formulating treatment plans, thereby improving the treatment outcomes of patients. By comparing with the traditional Tada formula in the estimation of the amount of bleeding, the paper shows the advantages of its model in terms of accuracy and computational efficiency. The model was tested on a data set containing 341 CT scans of intracerebral hemorrhage, and the results show that its segmentation accuracy (DSC 85.66%) and computational efficiency (6.2 seconds per sample) are both better than those of the traditional method.