Constraints on Supermassive Black Hole Binaries from JWST and NANOGrav

Hamsa Padmanabhan,Abraham Loeb
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1051/0004-6361/202449185
2024-04-09
Abstract:We use the recent statistics of dual active galactic nuclei (AGN) in the $James \ Webb \ Space \ Telescope$ (JWST) data at $z \sim 3.4$ to address two aspects of the feedback and evolution scenarios of supermassive black hole binaries (SMBHB). We find that the JWST data provide evidence for the members of a binary black hole being 'lit' at the same time, rather than independently -- a scenario which is consistent with gas-rich mergers being responsible for concurrent AGN activity. This conclusion is supported by the recent NANOGrav Pulsar Timing Array (PTA) measurements, whose upper limits on the stochastic gravitational wave strain amplitude lie below those expected from extrapolating the dual AGN fraction. The results indicate either a 'stalling' of the binaries at the separations probed by NANOGrav, or rapid gas-driven inspirals.
High Energy Astrophysical Phenomena,Cosmology and Nongalactic Astrophysics,General Relativity and Quantum Cosmology
What problem does this paper attempt to address?
The problems that this paper attempts to solve mainly focus on two aspects: 1. **Whether Dual Active Galactic Nuclei (Dual AGN) are activated simultaneously**: - The research aims to explore whether, in super - massive black hole binary systems (SMBHBs), the two black holes are simultaneously activated to become active galactic nuclei (AGN). Specifically, the paper examines the possibility of such simultaneous activation by analyzing the Dual AGN statistical results in James Webb Space Telescope (JWST) data. If the Dual AGN members do indeed "glow" simultaneously, this will support the hypothesis that gas - rich mergers are the main mechanism for triggering AGN activity. 2. **The "Final Parsec" Problem or Gas - Rich Mergers**: - The paper also explores whether there is a "Final Parsec" problem during the merger of super - massive black hole binaries, that is, whether the two black holes stall after reaching a certain distance and are unable to continue merging. Another possibility is gas - rich mergers, in which case the two black holes merge very quickly, resulting in a weak gravitational wave signal observed by low - frequency gravitational wave detectors such as NANOGrav. The paper evaluates these two possibilities by combining JWST data and the measurement results of the NANOGrav Pulsar Timing Array (PTA). ### Main Conclusions - **Dual AGN are activated simultaneously**: - JWST data indicate that Dual AGN members are likely to be activated simultaneously rather than glowing independently. This conclusion is consistent with the gas - rich merger hypothesis, that is, during the merger process, the two black holes are driven by a large amount of gas, causing them to be active simultaneously. - **The "Final Parsec" Problem or Gas - Rich Mergers**: - The measurement results of the NANOGrav PTA show that the intensity of the gravitational wave background is lower than expected, which may mean that there is a "Final Parsec" problem, or that most mergers are gas - rich mergers, resulting in an accelerated merger of the two black holes, thereby reducing the signal strength of low - frequency gravitational waves. ### Related Formulas - **Dark Matter Halo Merger Rate**: \[ \frac{dn_{\text{halo}}}{dz d\xi} = A \left( \frac{M_h}{10^{12} M_\odot} \right)^\alpha \xi^\beta \exp \left( \frac{\xi}{\bar{\xi}} \right)^{\gamma_1} (1 + z)^\eta \] - **Black Hole - Dark Matter Halo Mass Relationship**: \[ M_{\text{BH}} = M_h \epsilon_0 \left( \frac{M_h}{10^{12} M_\odot} \right)^{\gamma/3 - 1} \left( \frac{\Delta v \Omega_m h^2}{18 \pi^2} \right)^{\gamma/6} (1 + z)^{\gamma/2} \] - **Black Hole Merger Rate**: \[ \frac{dN_{\text{BH,mrg}}}{dz dq} = A_1 f_{\text{bh}} \left( \frac{M_h}{10^{12} M_\odot} \right)^\alpha q^{3/\gamma - 1 + 3\beta/\gamma} (1 + z)^\eta \exp \left[ \left( \frac{q}{\bar{q}} \right)^{3\gamma_1/\gamma} \right] \] - **Gravitational Wave Strain Power Spectrum**: \[ h_c^2(f_{\text{obs}}) = \frac{4\pi}{3c^2 (2\pi f_{\text{obs}})^{4/3}} \int_{q_{\text{min}}}^{q_{\text{max}}} \int_{z_{\text{min}}}^{z_{\text{max}}} \int_{M_{\text{min}}}^{M_