Abstract:In the aftermath of the 2008 crisis, investment strategies using maximum drawdown as a risk management objective have gained popularity. A systematic approach to control the maximum drawdown is the TIPP strategy, which allows investors to limit drawdowns to a chosen pre-defined level or risk-budget by dynamically allocating wealth between the “risk-free” asset and a performance-seeking portfolio. However, a weak interest rate environment represents a burden on this kind strategy, due to an increased opportunity cost for the investor. This article illustrates innovative variants of the maximum drawdown control technique, seeking to decrease the opportunity costs of the drawdown protection as well as variations of the strategy to control maximum underperformance of benchmarked portfolios, opening new perspectives for investors in terms of loss-controlled investments. In the post-2008 era, a robust risk management process has been recognised as the basis to successful investment among best practices. In a highly uncertain environment, risk management processes should somehow address one of the main concerns of investors, namely, value protection. Loss aversion is a well documented feature of investors. Thus limiting maximum drawdown as a risk management objective is gaining popularity. This risk-metric turns out to be more intuitive to investors than volatility, for whom risk indicators should include potential cumulative losses on a portfolio. However, the current weak interest rate environment has weighted on “absolute return” investment approaches, inciting institutional investors to shift their focus towards more efficient risk management practices that do not enter in conflict with performance objectives. In this article, we propose dynamic riskbudgeting techniques to address the need for more cost-efficient (absolute) loss-controlled strategies. Furthermore, we introduce the concept of “relative” maximum drawdown1 (or maximum cumulative underperformance) and a dynamic allocation strategy that limits cumulative underperformance with respect to a given (investable) benchmark. This type of investment strategy can be of particular interest for institutional investors to enter alternative attractive investments such as emerging markets or high yield bonds, that come with an important “benchmark-risk” component. For example, while emerging market indices have outperformed developed large-cap equity indices on the long run and are expected to keep heading in the same direction, they have severely underperformed developed equity indices on several occasions. This phenomenon is particularly noticeable during market rallies, where relative cumulative underperformance can reach more than 50%2 over certain periods. Not to be confused with the standard maximum drawdown (MDD) concept, which is sometimes called relative MDD to differentiate it from its version expressed in dollar terms as opposed to relative change (returns) terms. In this article we always work with drawdowns expressed in percentage terms. See Table 4 and Figure 1 for details.

Constrained Max Drawdown: a Fast and Robust Portfolio Optimization Approach

Optimal Portfolio Strategy under Rolling Economic Maximum Drawdown Constraints

Discrete-time portfolio optimization under maximum drawdown constraint with partial information and deep learning resolution

A Relaxed Optimization Approach for Cardinality-Constrained Portfolio Optimization

Portfolio Optimization with Robust Covariance and Conditional Value-at-Risk Constraints

A Unified Framework for Fast Large-Scale Portfolio Optimization

Robust Markowitz: Comprehensively Maximizing Sharpe Ratio by Parametric-Quadratic Programming

Originating Multiple-Objective Portfolio Selection by Counter-Covid Measures and Analytically Instigating Robust Optimization by Mean-Parameterized Nondominated Paths

Portfolio selection under model uncertainty: a penalized moment-based optimization approach

Portfolio selection problems in practice: a comparison between linear and quadratic optimization models

An Efficient Global Optimal Method for Cardinality Constrained Portfolio Optimization

Mind the Cap! -- Constrained Portfolio Optimisation in Heston's Stochastic Volatility Model

Advances in Dynamic Risk Budgeting : Efficient Control of Absolute and Relative Risks †

A Continuous Optimization Approach for the Financial Portfolio Selection under Discrete Asset Choice Constraints

A Robust Statistics Approach to Minimum Variance Portfolio Optimization

Characterization of efficient frontier for mean-variance model with a drawdown constraint.

Portfolio reshaping under 1st-order stochastic dominance constraints by the exact penalty function methods

On Inefficiency of Markowitz-Style Investment Strategies When Drawdown is Important

The Boosted Difference of Convex Functions Algorithm for Value-at-Risk Constrained Portfolio Optimization

On Accelerating Large-Scale Robust Portfolio Optimization

Sparse and stable Markowitz portfolios